Blackbolt Posted May 29, 2013 Share Posted May 29, 2013 Strong;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Don_Dan Posted May 29, 2013 Crew Share Posted May 29, 2013 3:5 divider is bugged. I was already wondering, this would have been the best max clock result for a Cellshock kit ever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noliso Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 Why is this divider bugged? I see also other submissions with this divider. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morteza.p Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 Why is this divider bugged? I see also other submissions with this divider.  3:5 divider is bugged my friend  http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2290242 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaPaKaH Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 this could as well have been strap 200, you never know Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators websmile Posted May 31, 2013 Administrators Share Posted May 31, 2013 Even at the Gigabyte contest a few years ago 3:5 submissions were not accepted or recalculated to 2:3 because you cannot prove it has been made with 200 strap. If the board and mems can do it, it will work on 1:2 as well, so rebench it because the way it is now, the validation is useless Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noliso Posted June 1, 2013 Share Posted June 1, 2013 Thanks to all for your feedback. I have used 3:5 400mhz Strap for this submission, so it is incorrect because of this problem with the intel chipset. Sorry I don't know that before. Submission is already deleted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.