farshad rezvanian - Core i7 2600K @ 5300MHz - 4sec 240ms wPrime - 32m

[amin_caragt2]

Good Jop

 

[Mr. DB!]

its fuckin awesome!

[u22]

Win 8?

[farshad rezvanian]

Yes Win8!!

[I.M.O.G.]

So win8 produced a 2600K wp32 score equal to other people that ran 400Mhz+ higher. Seems suspicious.

[Mehdi_FXX]

@ I.M.O.G: this score is crazy for sure but you can test your 2600K in win8

[I.M.O.G.]

@ I.M.O.G: this score is crazy for sure but you can test your 2600K in win8

 

I've seen others test win8 and get no advantage. I also have referred to world record scores, and note which OS is being utilized.

 

Are you suggesting that the pros have the OS wrong?

[Mehdi_FXX]

I've seen others test win8 and get no advantage. I also have referred to world record scores, and note which OS is being utilized.

 

Are you suggesting that the pros have the OS wrong?

 

for sure pros have best OS

 

I know my friend(farshad) very very well and also i know he never ever make any fake result because of many reasons!

 

so...you say this is fake or something like bug, right?

[farshad rezvanian]

win8 for cpu test very nice os.... but you know can do it...

[I.M.O.G.]

Just scores like this warrant extra verification. A lot of people have spent a lot of time looking at efficiency, and results like this break conventions of what is known to be possible.

 

I have ran a lot of wprime on a few different platforms and know it to be very strongly tied to core frequency, and only minimally tweakable. OS selection makes an important difference, but less than 100ms. This score is 300ms faster than anyone else running 5300mhz on a 2600k, and only 60ms slower than my 5750mhz 2600k submission. From my experience, at a glance it makes me say something isn't right.

 

If its win8, the pros would be on it and everyone would be talking about the efficiency change... Submissions would skyrocket as people rerun on win8. I don't see any of that happening.

Edited July 4, 2013 by I.M.O.G.

[TerraRaptor]

My results on 3770k state no difference between win8 x64 and win7 x64 in wprime (both clean and tweaked). And, as I.M.O.G. has stated before, the proper choice of OS can give you 1-2% of performance even in best case scenario but not >5% as this sub.

[Mehdi_FXX]

Just scores like this warrant extra verification. A lot of people have spent a lot of time looking at efficiency, and results like this break conventions of what is known to be possible.

 

I have ran a lot of wprime on a few different platforms and know it to be very strongly tied to core frequency, and only minimally tweakable. OS selection makes an important difference, but less than 100ms. This score is 300ms faster than anyone else running 5300mhz on a 2600k, and only 60ms slower than my 5750mhz 2600k submission. From my experience, at a glance it makes me say something isn't right.

 

If its win8, the pros would be on it and everyone would be talking about the efficiency change... Submissions would skyrocket as people rerun on win8. I don't see any of that happening.

 

 

yes, you right something is wrong but we don`t know what is worng?! and if a result be true , nor fake! has no porblem

 

pls wait for video

[TerraRaptor]

this may be caused by 2D lags caused by VGA drivers not installed. Wprime actively refreshs its window and bugs in 2D output may influence the result - I have noticed this when benching Athlon XP.

[farshad rezvanian]

@TerraRaptor

Graphics driver was installed,

This is a video taken from the test

Have a question?

[Mehdi_FXX]

tnx for video my friend

[Aliover]

John F. was great.

[xxbassplayerxx]

If you watch the video, you can see that it doesn't complete all 8 threads to 100%. You can see the first 8 get to 50%, and then only 2 or 3 of them go to 100% before the window closes. Seems like a bug to me!