[GF]Duke Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 (edited) I think I like this bench. Easy peasy. Edited February 6, 2014 by [GF]Duke Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Leeghoofd Posted February 6, 2014 Crew Share Posted February 6, 2014 Benchmark has lost it's entire credibility... it's the new pcmark05... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[GF]Duke Posted February 6, 2014 Author Share Posted February 6, 2014 (edited) Yea I remember when I liked pcmark05 too. Edited February 6, 2014 by [GF]Duke Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Splave Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 pandas reaction to this ucbench score Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[GF]Duke Posted February 6, 2014 Author Share Posted February 6, 2014 Maybe I should work harder at this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Witchdoctor Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 Nice run bro Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chi-Kui Lam Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 Nice !! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BenchBros Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 WTF !!!! O_o HAHAHA to the Panda... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[GF]Duke Posted February 7, 2014 Author Share Posted February 7, 2014 Thanks guys. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loul Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 very nice and good job!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doug2507 Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 Benchmark has lost it's entire credibility... it's the new pcmark05... Why's that? Nice score man. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Leeghoofd Posted February 7, 2014 Crew Share Posted February 7, 2014 Why's that? Because we are beating scores with 600MHz less on the CPU frequency that 's why Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doug2507 Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 Surely that's down to the individual to find out what works and what doesn't though? It's good to see a benchmark that doesn't completely revolve around 'fastest chip wins'. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[GF]Duke Posted February 7, 2014 Author Share Posted February 7, 2014 It a David vs Goliath syndrome!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Splave Posted February 8, 2014 Share Posted February 8, 2014 Surely that's down to the individual to find out what works and what doesn't though? It's good to see a benchmark that doesn't completely revolve around 'fastest chip wins'. Doug for president! couldnt agree more, this is not the new pcmark05 its the new 3dmar01 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
![[GF]Duke](data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2Fsvg%22%20viewBox%3D%220%200%201024%201024%22%20style%3D%22background%3A%239662c4%22%3E%3Cg%3E%3Ctext%20text-anchor%3D%22middle%22%20dy%3D%22.35em%22%20x%3D%22512%22%20y%3D%22512%22%20fill%3D%22%23ffffff%22%20font-size%3D%22700%22%20font-family%3D%22-apple-system%2C%20BlinkMacSystemFont%2C%20Roboto%2C%20Helvetica%2C%20Arial%2C%20sans-serif%22%3EG%3C%2Ftext%3E%3C%2Fg%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.