[GF]Duke Posted February 6, 2014 Posted February 6, 2014 (edited) I think I like this bench. Easy peasy. Edited February 6, 2014 by [GF]Duke Quote
Crew Leeghoofd Posted February 6, 2014 Crew Posted February 6, 2014 Benchmark has lost it's entire credibility... it's the new pcmark05... Quote
[GF]Duke Posted February 6, 2014 Author Posted February 6, 2014 (edited) Yea I remember when I liked pcmark05 too. Edited February 6, 2014 by [GF]Duke Quote
[GF]Duke Posted February 6, 2014 Author Posted February 6, 2014 Maybe I should work harder at this. Quote
Doug2507 Posted February 7, 2014 Posted February 7, 2014 Benchmark has lost it's entire credibility... it's the new pcmark05... Why's that? Nice score man. Quote
Crew Leeghoofd Posted February 7, 2014 Crew Posted February 7, 2014 Why's that? Because we are beating scores with 600MHz less on the CPU frequency that 's why Quote
Doug2507 Posted February 7, 2014 Posted February 7, 2014 Surely that's down to the individual to find out what works and what doesn't though? It's good to see a benchmark that doesn't completely revolve around 'fastest chip wins'. Quote
[GF]Duke Posted February 7, 2014 Author Posted February 7, 2014 It a David vs Goliath syndrome!!! Quote
Splave Posted February 8, 2014 Posted February 8, 2014 Surely that's down to the individual to find out what works and what doesn't though? It's good to see a benchmark that doesn't completely revolve around 'fastest chip wins'. Doug for president! couldnt agree more, this is not the new pcmark05 its the new 3dmar01 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.