Submission & member moderation

http://www.hwbot.org/hallOfFame.do?type=result&applicationId=3 3. 9.33 sec - maxxxpct (shark oc team i...) - (Intel Core 2 X6800 ... @ 5506mhz) No link or picture ... But i found that it exists here : http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=117753 Also... SuperPi - 9.67 sec - md_curl (OverClocking-Ma...) - (Intel Core 2 X6800 ... @ 5276mhz) No link or picture , but i found it there :http://www.overclocking-masters.com/forum/hwbot-Classement-Super-PI-1M,p157200.htm#p157200 Someone please fix the results .

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=553202 This result on SLi.

Hi..this kinda follows on from the thread on XS. Obviously some groups of us meet up to bench, and gear pooling happens. I guess the question of "who does the score belong to?" Would it be ok to have a team log in for team efforts e.g EP-UK have "someone" called "EP-UK bench" or similar, as an open account we can submit group results from? K

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=558788 How does a lower speed CPU and lower clocks on the card, beat even the higher speed CPU, and higher card clocks

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=553109

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=558552 it is SLI,but not Single! Block tis result!

I was browsing the results for Opty 148 .09 and found this one>http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=566265 There is absolutely no way an Opty 148 will run 21.42s at only 3080mhz. Also there is no CPUz in the shot and what kind of SPi app is being run there anyway? lol It may have been classified wrong or submitted incorrectly. You are doing a great job my friends thanks! Phase

pkotlowski (PCArena.pl) have a cheating result! Look....... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561034 his screen http://www.fotosik.pl/pokaz_obrazek/pelny/b1e4a262a136a435.html how he can score with so baby clocks?? i think....it was on 1024x768 resolution!

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=505614 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=505577 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=503447 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=505632 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=504579 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=537678 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=550433 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=545593 thank you

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=505534 plz fix

This user probably missed the sli/crossfire in the system description in his forumpost. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=557809 Can you guys fix it? Seems that he has alot of bugs with his results. http://hwbot.org/user.do?userId=5863

I posted an Athlon 64 3400+ Newcastle, and got second place, aka. silver. How long time does it take before the points + cup shows up / how fast does it become verficated? PS postet directly to the website, not from my team's forum

So it was a pretty well discussed issue that if you didnt actually point out in your post that the chip was a Venice, it would become labelled a Newcastle by default. And you have done great work going around cleaning up such instances by delving deeper one by one and categorising them by hand, where there was doubt you seem to have made it "CPU uknown". Unfortunately for me, this means that even after i have editted and rescanned my posts to include the word Venice, it still lists them all as "CPU uknown" and doesnt seem to budge.

I've entered this result (http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=564784) while i was creating an account. Something went wrong and it's not registered on my name. Is it possible to delete the result? Did on my account this benches http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=564881 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=564824 Same cpu, goes even faster & uploaded from the same IP (and uploaded for the same team). Sorry guys, it's my first time

George reported by accident ( I'm quite sure ) his X1800XT 512MB as X1800XT 256MB. http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1871199 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=559267

i forgot to add a screenie so my a3 score was blocked submitted new one http://aycu09.webshots.com/image/7728/2002224430044174995_rs.jpg thanks and happy holidays cowie

Why better card scores is on category on X1950XT ? 3d2k1, 3d2k3, 3d2k5 and 2k6 ... single and CrossFire result. This is not good for X1950XT user. Regards Martin

I reported one guys result (no name mentioned) But his score is still in the system, and as a revenge i think or something he reported my result because my resolution didnt show on the screenshot. Fear enough, but my score was blocked, I have updated my score with futuremark link. But it is still blocked. Can someone help me please? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562267

Hi! I benched a little two days ago with my X1800XT 256 card, today i got a mail that a result in suspicious since I am a moderator of the Techsweden team, I checked my results and now 1 of them is 512-card and two other results are "BLOCKED" what does that mean? I put X1800XT 256 in the topic of every ORB-result so this wouldn't happen, but it still did, so how do I fix this, and the blocked thing? Regards. Kristoffer aka Kriller

Well, I just noticed that there's a user with 2 accounts, and posting the results on both accounts. Username 1: Quentin*OCM* ( Overclocking Masters ) Username 2: Quentin ( Overclocking Masters )

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=547609

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=558183 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=5061107 4305MHz Core 2 - X1800XT 256MB @ 720/765 = 22904 Marks @ 3Dm03 /// vs 3708MHz Core2 - X1800XT 256 ( ??? nope ) @ 620/747 = 23646 3dm 03

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9030684 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=550894 check out the reported as suspicious scores a little bit better please.

Username: Epox for life Benchmarks using X1900XTX CF Edition card registering it as X1800XT 256MB @ HW Bot Result here http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=558118

SLI appearing as single result: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=506535 3Dmark 2005 - 14494 marks - ElDuderino (XtremeSystems) 11 points - [ link ] - [ compare ] Processor: Athlon 64 4400+ X2 @ 3050mhz [ compare cpu ] Videocard: GeForce 7800 GTX @ 499/690mhz [#1 single GeForce 7800 GTX in 3Dmark 2005] Very very SLI