Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Casanova

Members
  • Posts

    264
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by Casanova

  1. Thanks for the info, didn't know this. He did an amazing score.
  2. I know that score for reference is just cpuz validation screenshot, i just asked because i'm pretty sure he just uploaded the wrong print screen for country cup comp.
  3. Is it in the rules? I didn't found it: https://hwbot.org/news/1588_application_18_rules/
  4. Print screen shows 680, did you uploaded the wrong file?
  5. Nice review Michael ☺️
  6. I'm pretty sure this was not towards to you Allen, you're still a overclock.net member and a well known and respected overclocker
  7. Actually this limitation does not exist http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2133058_drswizz_superpi_386sx_16_27days_19h_31min_43sec_488ms
  8. Sure hahaha! If i wasn't using a math coprocessor this run would have take 11 to 12 days! I'm trying to run 32m but after 9 hours (before giving initial value) it crashs with that SQR05 value problem. I'm almost sure that this happens because this hdd is too small, only 50mb free space disk.
  9. Windows 3.1 using win32s to make Superpi able to run under a 16bits system
  10. @antinomy i'll change this submission hardware category when you create the database for it. Thanks again :)
  11. Antinomy, if possible, please add this one too: Thanks in advance
  12. Fellows, i'm doing some bech tests with this FPU/Math Coprocessor from IIT company. It's basically a cpu dedicated to process floating point unit operations. Since 486dx they were embedded in this cpus, but in 386 era they were provided separately by some companies, IIT is one of them. Any more information you guys need i'll be more than happy to provide @Strunkenbold
  13. Sorry for asking, but wasn't you who mentioned in another thread that you already have like five or six rex? Are you binning it or something?
  14. @Leeghoofd
  15. Hey Alby, is the asrock 4coredual sata2 still available?
  16. Thanks A LOT It is correct, amd "clone" version of original intel 80386sx, Cyrix made their ones too. Back in middle 80'ies Intel had a deal with Amd and other companies that allowed then to produce their own 386, but they are essencially all the same cpus" ng80386sx Edit: This is the datasheet from amd 386 processors, along with a table from wiki (the info is correct, i checked it in the datasheet): http://pdf.datasheetcatalog.com/datasheet/AdvancedMicroDevices/mXwtys.pdf Model number Frequency FSB Voltage Power Socket Release date AMD Am386SX/SXL-33 33 MHz 33 MHz 5 V 1.35 Watt 100-pin PQFP 1992 am80386family.pdf
  17. I did a print screen with some information that might help. Unfortunately this old cpu is not compatible with cpuz or any other "modern" cpu id software, but i used old norton system info and checkcpu windows 3.1 software to help identify it. I also want to know if a print screen like this will be enough for a future superpi1m validation run? I did a "quick" superpi16k run as an example. @Leeghoofd or @Antinomy i would apreciatte some help with this. If you guys need any other info please quote me here. Thanks a lot. SP16KSS.BMP
  18. @Antinomy what informations do you need to add this cpu to the database?
  19. Nice price indeed.
  20. This ng80386sx-33 is not available under amd or intel database options. I opened a ticket under support forum, thanks :)
  21. @Antinomy please add this cpu to the database, i could not find it under Amd 80386 options. Thanks in advance
×
×
  • Create New...