Casanova

@george\.kokovinis Is this guy you??? GKINVEST (George Kokovinis) has died - Page 2 - BMW M5 Forum and M6 Forums

Who are you?? http://www.m5board.com/vbulletin/e63-bmw-m6-forum-bmw-m6-convertible-m6board-com/407898-gkinvest-george-kokovinis-has-died.html#/enter

Amazing frequency!!!

I made my first extreme overclock session with GPU. i7 5960x + Galax 980ti on extreme with Ln2. recorded more than 3 hours and made this timelapse video,hopeyou guys like it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vt3K_KqTPGU&feature=youtu.be

Thanks Ronaldo That would be rule number 4, so no, u can not do that

Hello everyone. I'm organizing and promoting a (really) small overclock tournament on facebook: https://m.facebook.com/groups/606748646118363?view=permalink&id=995839243875966&ref=bookmarks I made some rules, since it's limited to 4.6ghz for intel and 5ghz for Amd. Also, i created 2 (two) formulas to balance as many generations as possible, including the number of cores. Of course it's far from perfect, but it's working well so far (the tournament has been running for about 10 days). Since i could not find sponsorship, there is no prize ;( but the spirit is to make the competitors seek for system optimization and tweaks. [OVERCLOCK TOURNAMENT] 2D MASTERS Hello, and welcome to the 1st Tournament Overclock 2D Masters! This is an open overclocking competition for any processor from any generation. The tournament will have separate rankings for Intel and AMD. The rules for competition are the following: 1. Frequency limitation: 4.6ghz Intel and 5GHz processors for AMD processors, with a margin of + 10mhz limit of tolerance, ie the maximum frequency for the result to be considered valid are 4610mhz and 5010mhz for Intel to AMD. Results sent often above these values ​​will not be considered for scoring purposes and will be disregarded; 2. Place the paper official tournament wall; 3. Turn successfully each of the following benchmarks: • HWBOT Prime • Geekbench 3 • Superpi32m • Cinebench r11.5 • Cinebench r15 4. are not allowed any software or human interference that alter the perception of speed / score of the benchmark program (hack the benchmark program), sabotaging it in order to make him believe that lapped faster. 5. Tweaks and optimizations of OS and hardware via bios or application are allowed and even encouraged, so the competitive extract as much as possible from your system; 6. After the result of the benchmark, the competitor must open the CPUZ software with mandatory 3 tabs: "CPU '', '' Mainboard '' and '' Memory ''. Optionally the competitor can also open the "SPD" tab, provided the mandatory 3 tabs are open, too; 7. The competitor should printar the result screen. The print should contain the open benchmark on the screen to their score, the mandatory tabs CPUZ and the official wallpaper of the tournament (no need to display the entire wallpaper, but at least one part to identify the official paper of the tournament) ; 8. After the print, the competitor must save it and send the saved file in this post official tournament. PUNCTUATION The score for ranking of the composition will be the sum of the results obtained in the benchmarks, weighted according to the equation: INTEL: P = ((G * ΣR) / N) - (Gi * SP) AMD: P = ((G * ΣR) / N) - (Gi * (SP / 2)) where: P: Weighted score; G: Multiplier processor generation; ΣR: sum of the results obtained in the benchmarks, excluding the SuperPi (in Geekbench 3 is the sum of scores single and multi, divided by 10, in Cinebench r11.5 will be the score multiplied by 200 in Cinebench R15 will be the score multiplied by 2, and press hwbot be divided by the score 4). Gi: Factor generation negative weighted to superpi32m. N: number of physical processor cores; SP: Result obtained in Superpi32m, converted to seconds. The multiplier factor "G" in the formula will comply with the following criteria INTEL: • CORE 2: 1.5x • Nehalem: 1.32x • SANDY: 1.182x • IVY: 1.161x • Haswell: 1.093x • BROADWELL: 1.042x • Skylake: 1x AMD: • BULLDOZER: 1.202x • piledriver: 1.136x • Steamroller: 1.068x • EXCAVATOR: 1x NUMBER OF CORES: the benchmark result will be divided by the number of physical processor cores. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1OckXhumke6aFT52Sox8TGuVrk610G4DunESnk0ycKm4/htmlview AWARDS: Still got no sponsor for this tournament, but we are still evaluating the idea to fabricate custom medals for the top three finishers in each category. RANKING: The competitive position in the ranking will be given by the sum of the weighted results in the benchmarks. RANKING INTEL 1st place: 2008.39 points - Alex Silva Tersaiol 2nd place: 1771.22 points - Edson Souza 3rd place: 1767.38 points - Maykon Helver 4th place: 1742.83 points - Jaime Luiz de Souza 5th place: 1687.87 points - TheLaw Pedro 6th place: 1429.50 points - Casanova 7th place: 1312.20 points - Gabriel Ledema Sales 8th place: 1137.48 points - Antonio Simiao 9th place: 10th place: RANKING AMD 1st place: 547.33 points - Jaime (Joe90br) 2nd place: 266.18 points - Lucas Fank 3rd place: 4th place: 5th place: 6th place: 8th place: 9th place: 10th place: Contestants can compete with any AMD and / or Intel processor, may compete in both categories. Competitors may rise results with different processors in the same category, but will be considered only the processor to get more points. PERIOD: The tournament begins today, lasting one month, ending at 23h59m of 10/20/2016. LINKS: Wallpaper: Attached to this post. CPUZ: CPU-Z | Softwares | CPUID HWBOT Prime: http://url.hwbot.org/1ahLmxJ Geekbench 3: Geekbench 3 - Cross-Platform Processor Benchmark - Geekbench Superpi32m: http://url.hwbot.org/1x9EUxE Cinebench r11.5: http://url.hwbot.org/1EPq8jT Cinebench r15: http://url.hwbot.org/1FrlRDn Good luck to all competitors!

Had some problems with dram, had to run on single channel.

Awesome record Vince, congrats pal

Amazing job Rauf, do you think i can apply this to my 5960x and R5E U/3.1? I have the g.skill bdie 2x8gb 3600/c16 modules.. Thanks in advance and thanks for sharing this

I agree. More HP is good for overclockers that bench many different hardware, and more slots for GP is needed because there are increasingly benchmarks listed. And considering that OCe have a year reset, 10 is enough. My suggestion: 20 Global points slots 35 Hardware points slots 10 OCe points

Holy s**t! I didn`t saw the RAM latencys! Supertigh latencys at over 4100mhz!! This HOF DDR4 memory made G.skill eat dust, really amazing. Well done man!

Amazing frequency, congrats!!

You're the voice of reason here XA, thanks a lot for exposing this to the XOC. I said something about this on another thread, but since i'm ust a newbie moch me was more easy to answer... Indeed, my opinion is the same i said before, new hw points should be put of freeze for sometime, like two months or more.

If the Hwbot staff is keeping ES and other unfair methods just because they need the sponsors... them they are dummies imo, just because there is no competition on CPU industry anymore, Intel all the way in man! Nvidia the same thing, unless we start to think about subvendors competition, but that's another history...

Subbed to this post, will be watching.

Hello, i want to change my nickname to Casanova.

I already made a suggestion about this situation in another thread. Solution: create a delay of about two months to give league points to new hardware.

Considering that hwbot league is a competition and users are targeted between elite, extreme, apprentice, enthusiast, novice and rookie, sounds really unfair that extremely fierce competitions that set many WR can be taken down by h20 with small amount of overclock on gpu. The solution: submissions made with very new hardware should not be given points for at least a month or two, simple because almost no overclocker can have access to it, and this kind of removes the "shine" of the competition. The highly disputed world record was taken by someone that made no effort to have that amount of bench points. Does it looks fair for someone here? I don't think so, unless you're a very selfish guy.

The way i suggested the oc league calculation points is to ensure the 3D a fair recognition, because everyone here knows that if we keep giving same points weight to 2d and 3d then MANY guys from Elite and Extreme league will give up from Hwbot and look to something else away from here (sorry to say the truth). Keep the 2d, but give the 3d a better global points weight, that's how i see a promising future to Hwbot.

Great one! Awesome cpu too congrats!

Congratula, amazing score and cpu

My 2cents about the Overclcokers League algorithm (i've changed the formula to show how it could be): League Points = A x (MAX(BP;GP)) + 2xB x (MAX(BP;GP)) + C x (MAX(HP)) + D x (MAX(CP)) A = Top 15 2D points B = Top 10 3D points C = Top 40 D = Top 15 BP = Benchmark Points GP = Global Points HP = Hardware Points CP = OC-ESPORTS Competition Points Let's be fair: who bench for 3D need to know 2D and RAM OC.

Awesome work rauf, and nice frozen-hardware pictures too

Great job! I'll try 8ghz soon.

Yeah, maybe i'm just overreacting to this new generation of cpu and gpu. I really hope things change and extreme comunity grow more in the next years.