chew*

That cinebench is ln2. It appears to clock like Llano. Things that make you go hmmm.

funny guy

WTF you doing in Taipei MM? you move there?

Msi has a board with 8+4 cpu power now. Looks like 4+2 for phases? tough to tell. I see 6 chokes. oops missed 4 chokes under heatsink. Total of 10. Weird layout cap wise with a mix of electrolytic and surface mount ( been awhile name escapes me ) Seeing a trend with the top end boards now.

Necessity is the mother of all inventions. If we need subtimings we will eventually gain access to them.

Ingenuity to gain access to more maybe?

I can no longer comment confirm nor deny anything anymore for time being

So lets look at some facts. We have 95watt rated tdp turbo chips. Safe to say that non turbo fully clocked to turbo speeds is going to consume more than 95 watts. The majority of boards thus far have an 8 pin ( 150 watt ) Then we have the ASUS ROG hero with an 8 + 4 ( 225 watt ) I am not a rocket scientist and been away for awhile but im going to guess the Hero is not the top tier of ROG. If this is not a top tier and they are supplying 225 watts I'm quite sure there is a good reason. That said if the hero is supplying 225 watts and my sources have reported no cpu deaths but confirmed board deaths ( no mention of which boards ) I think its safe to assume that when oced under extreme conditions these chips may be exceeding 150 watt draw. conclusion? We may see and want to wait for beefier powered boards ( those of us who plan to beat the snot out of these chips loaded 16 threads ln2 )

My money is on reality. Nice to be back in my own capacity versus puppet capacity Dre will be played by msimax

On the Global side of WR's? Not going to happen at least not initially. my 2c.

Competition is going to be fierce

I thbought he was canadian.

maybe, youve only seen the tip of the iceberg so far imo

Bit optimistic about 8 gig 8 err I mean 4 cores 8 clusters through 3d there aren't you....

Fun cpu's to OC becasue its a challenge........ 920 DO AMD phenom II X2 550 (non BE) LLano ES ( if you lock multi to retail ) 939 just about all of them Preety much anything that has a high enough multi to make it fun but low enough to still make it a challenge............etc something that the finest of tuning can and will change the outcome. Everything else is just a binning game where money just flat out ruins the fun and sport of it......... Funnest vga's to clock 8800gt 512 and 4850, cards that binning just for a good core means shit, quality of mods and amount of mods and ram play a huge role as well.......

From what I can see on this board with all the bios's avail the maxxes we should see are providing retail cpu and locked gpu base clock at 600. Vantage 7000-7100 ( <-- this bench run back to back 3 times when you get it stable, no clue why but scores get better until after 3rd run ) Heaven roughly 310-315 ( this bench is brutal, doesn't scale much best score done on first run, tesselation off in CCC obviously ) 3d11 1870-1900, ( same as vantage, run it back to back ) This is all stuff I tested at 161 bclk at 2500+ ram, 161 seems to be a hard wall for 3d. I would focus on bclk at highest ram possible. Ditch the high cpu speed and tight primary timings, it plays little role here. Hope this helps.

We are all preety educated here on what is and is not possible and therefore further proof is not really needed in most cases. It's never wise to jump to conclusions till the math is done however. It can make you and or the other party look bad. After the what is and or is not possible is determined the next obvious step is to determine how and why, if the score was in no mans land say 745,00-750,000 effeciency range which would more than likely indicate a run done in the "middle" it could very well be written off as a bugged run. That sort of narrows a bug out of the picture. I stick by my final math though, the effeciency is to "spot on" when you calculate it at 51X. Whether it was a turbo issue or intentional is up to hwbot admins.

I scanned the rankings, best i saw for effec was a 5500 run at 138.076. That said I tend to agree, maybe turbo kicked in by accident................ Some quick math. The run I looked at effeciency rating ( lower is better ) 754,918 The run in question. 740,188 Thats got to be one hell of a tweak. More math. Add 51X muti to the score in question. effeciency = 755204. hmmmmmmm............... *Edit* keep in mind I scanned the rankings in the 5500 cpu range and took the best from that range, Effeciency is not always linear and best compared around the same clock speeds.

Not just phantom for ln2 cooling .com We have a few revs for ln2 and a few LHE designs and some other interesting yet never publicized stuff Not my company btw, just a supporter of a product that works.

You guys are no fun. It takes ballz ballz ballz of steel to wait to the last second and pray that the server traffic due to everyone logging in to find the out come doesn't slow it down so bad that the submit barely makes the timeline. True story.

Who wants to buy some skill for $700 dollah. I will overnight it.

You Haz Bag of Sand?

One thing you just never know is what the hell chew* is gonna do next........ The million dollar questions are. Does he have an MSI board? What would that result be in a proper OS tuned? Will leeghoofd ever come out of the closet?

http://members.cox.net/wmdieselmc26/A75UD4H.F5g

Here's my unnofficial 3D 11 entry. Have fun guys. Fm link http://3dmark.com/3dm11/1629967