chew*

I think if a team is organized a bunch of guys will get together and say OK i have this this and this, what do you have? So for instance a bud of mine has a matrix 4870, I have only a reference.......well heck dude you tackle that class your matrix has way more potential. I save ln2, I can focus on another class where my cards will have more potential. When you bench for a hw specific class in rev 4 you truly are repping your team, thats the way I see it. Our team has already gotten together and said hey ok you have this and this and this, I have this and this and this. Lets figure out whats best then divvy it up My anaylsis for rev 4? Teams win, manufacturers lose. No need for a team to buy 20 samples of a 580 GTX + 990X to be competetive to spam the latest HW class for points anymore.

Absolutely it won't be sad, those 2 scores were in preperation of rev 4. We knew the highest would count the most so we tried to get the highest possible we could for our team with what we had at our disposal

So does intel cherry pick retail chips for benchers? This chip straight from intel marketing. L051B170 0586 53X, didn't waste time testing further other than to jump multis just in case..... Oh and to put a # to my 5664mhz L041C108 4323 Also we forgot to add all the junk from L041C108, forget the numbers but the count is 10 chips 53X to 54X

Nothing wrong with sharing cpu's mobos for 3d which is what I was referring to travis, which is also why I didn't quite understand the complaint. I'm only going by what you told me personally about testing a few chips with him for 3d. I think my above post was misinterpreted. So bottom line what I meant to say is if you share cpu's boards for 3d why complain if someone else does, thats all. I know other teams do, they even say so, nothing wrong with it. Hell I sent my own personal 980X and R III E ( from OC summit winnings ) around to XS to bench 3d on, the only difference really is the chip sucked, people only complain when the chip is good.

More or less ran this just for another compare of correct scaling.

Dumo's coming soon with a 5790 ish, then I whip out all the tricks.

Like it matters, if I didn't have his cpu and I had my 100 mhz less cpu with a better IMC + ln2 I would blast my own score which I intend to do anyway. Unless of course you don't think I can do it....... Also to "team bench" costs money, 3 hour+ ride, gas, rental or bus ticket. Not to mention we pooled money together for our cpu's till we found decent one's. Last I read to share a cpu in a 3d bench is completely legit so I don't even see why this was even brought up. Anyway thats the whole purpose of rev 4, so that teams can't dominate top 5 in a ranking, a xeon class comes to mind....... Don't you bench with Travis and share his errr I mean ASUS's cpu's boards etc etc

See tighter timings............

Becasue pro If i ran tight timings like you I would not only bug maxxmem but also my sytstem would be so unstable, I would get double posts like you. :

Becasue pro If i ran tight timings like you I would not only bug maxxmem but also my sytstem would be so unstable, I would get double posts like you. :

I should hum that trackball at you now for running the NB higher than 4500 :

Looks good pro, Right where i would expect it to be. I see you listened about not exceeding CPU clocks with NB clocks for this one, that or your cpu was a turd for NB :

To many, intel sux.

No challenge, phase is as far as I go, can't afford ln2 right now.

And your D9's

1x1 gig has it's advantages, NB clocks being one of them Cpu's not really that great, All my good 965's died under ln2.

On AMD? LOL its a miracle this can even run

OC windforce, I had a weird issue with one of my monitors in XP that would not run res at default of bench in 06, maybe that is whats wrong with your setup? Otherwise not sure.

Probably becasue of the same reasons man........ Benchmark not run at defaults in the score display.........

Benchmark not run at defaults in the score display.........

Most likely OCP, I would just follow elmors for OCP and per phase OCP though. Easier to return card to normal state.

Massman, you were right, guy had EIST on, that you tube chip is 55X confirmed.

All I can say is WTF. 59X L050933 1948

Getting closer to figuring this out. L041C108 4244 56X 5700 with bclk. Another L041C108 4XXX 56X lock splash 55X boots still testing max.......5665 so far, this is all stock cooler with some cold.

Hey massman. Lets start requesting default VID of batches along with the other info just becasue a chip has a decent multi doesn't make it good. Also have a hunch that within certain batches multi is tied into VID somehow 2600K L050A933 2210 54 X not 5.4 wprime 1024 stable. 2600K L042B208 4508 51X didn't waste my time. 2500K L046B078 2573 52X seems to be very decent for 24/7 low vid, 1.325 bios set LLC L2 4800 prime stable EDIT more chips from my bench partner 2600K L041C108 2350 5.4 L041C108 3832 5.5