Splave

So all current scores that don't have ecc on but "feel" correct can enjoy being permanently 2-3% better performance? If we require it for some we must require it for all. Time to press delete on all 4090 subs without ecc if this is the path we are taking.

Gold

100% agree, would be really great if we could convince GPU-Z to add ECC check box near where the CUDA etc check boxes are.

Gaming cards yes, not benchmarking OC cards so I guess we are in a hybrid category When you are OCing memory +2000 mhz offset there is bound to be issues right? Why would NV leave that much on the table unless there was possible implications they already anticipated.

Glad I started this thread.

You guys are trying too hard. ?

nice run!

What's a discord

Yeah even on air 6ghz gpu was helping. Having issues with driver, had to install via device manager and no control panel access. Hope you smash it bro.

Always Nice to see retail high freq

To those responding we are talking to FM already, why not do it in public so I can be aware of the issue too and everyone else? Thats why I made the thread. I guess this is an article here? I also didnt name any names which I could (and will if they dont pull them themesleves. one person already did) and oh yes the ones I see should know way better. These are not noobs. The information is here, they can choose to apply it to themselves or not.

Awesome.

https://hwbot.org/submission/5119452_splave_unigine_superposition___1080p_xtreme_geforce_rtx_4090_26552_points/https://hwbot.org/submission/5119452_splave_unigine_superposition___1080p_xtreme_geforce_rtx_4090_26552_points/ bugged thx

3D benching as we know it is broken. Plain and simple. What are we going to do about it? RTX-4090's are great cards but they also bug very easily. We need to be better users. If you see your score jump 1k point after raising your mem clock 15mhz that is not normal and not a "lucky" run. When your entire screen is tan from an artifact spanning your entire monitor and your score increases 10% it is not a "lucky run." In my opinion after a first warning we should issue a vacation for the user. After 2 minutes of research it is quite easy to see a bugged run. Which 2 look normal, which 2 look equally strange? Going from the pictures alone is easy but when I add the clock frequencies maybe it can help you even more. I propose that: 1. If you post a known bugged run you get a warning, then a vacation. 2. If you are "unsure" then ask a mod or even me if it seems out of line. It is quite easy to read. 3. We require monitoring already in 3dMark benches, I propose we show the FPS and FPS average graph section in the result screenshot, if you cant fit it add a second screenshot with it. 4. Always welcome to video / disclose tweaks to mods for doubters. With the blessing of Roman/Albrecht, people have a week to remove results that "oh maybe it did have a lot of artifacts, or maybe it does seem too high" before we dive in and hand our warnings, or vacations for multiple infractions. Im sorry if you feel like I am always the one exposing this stuff, but why do I always have to be the one to do it? We all work hard on this stuff and an even playing field is the of the utmost importance. Without it this places means nothing. Let's do better, and be better.

Leg work paid off

thanks looping for .999 and 1.0 reduction for couple hours was boring af

how do you compete if you cant buy it either...

Nice run

nice one :D

no mods 600w bios :P

Congrats

yes

last couple pairs left these are Special, better than any retail out. After this will not reorder more

sold thankyou

maybe momentarily? there is snapshot from the 14th https://web.archive.org/web/20221014192003/https://xdevs.com/