Splave

I can see how this is less about the money now in the sense of hardware. But I just feel now like the best of the best stuff is not worth it now, why push the bleeding edge without reward is what they are saying. A e6600 is more of a money maker than a 975 in the new version which just seems a bit backwards. You were talking about getting more sponsors. Why would they want to back you when you are in-directly forcing people to scour ebay and other forums looking for old hardware that is worth more points then jumping over to the egg to buy their newest products that are worth jack you know?

Ive read through this thread and the other one and still dont get how the points work. Maye a quick cheat sheet or something could be posted? Also I guess I will sell off my 4x5870s, 4 way board, w3570 etc and go back to 8800gtx's and c2d stuff. With the new point system the best spot will always be 1-2 generations behind the latest hardware.

thanks guys

I assume it should go under 5970 multi card ? As 3x5970 or 2x5970? I figure 3 as thats how many total cards, then note it in the description and show in gpuz.

yup thanks mister turrican

Ticket ID: 684 Priority: Low Our team lost 110 points last night and we cant figure out what happen, lol any insight? Any bugs been reported score wise? Very strange.

you rule bro!

it says you dont participate in the rankings ie you have to check the box at the bottom before you submit saying that you want a score nice run btw

Ticket ID: 659 Priority: High http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/7fh28/\r\nGPU-Z dump \r\n\r\nThanks guys

your guys are amazing

Ticket ID: 578 Priority: Medium 9600gso 512mb gddr3\r\n\r\nRebranded 8800gts 512mb I believe, uses cheaper ram than the other 9600gso\'s 1500mhz seems to be the ceiling on them. \r\n\r\nNewegg link\r\nhttp://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814121320&Tpk=9600gso\r\n\r\nGPU-Z valid\r\nhttp://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/cxr2h/ Valid\r\n\r\nThanks guys

are you in slow mode? maybe try a long cmos clear with the battery out

any luck getting the rated fsb over 4 ghz? 248 seems to be close to my ud4p max albeit lower multi. 5.2ghz is nasty

thanks as always jmke

Can you just confirm we are still using 1.5 ? I see soooo many results using 2.00 and I get better times with 2.00. Have been reporting them when I see them. Should I not be?

Should be seperate? Seems the 16sp versions have upgraded ram as well. Please discuss, priority on this should be about 1.5/10 though so dont worry about it too hard keep up the good work guys

^indeed thanks to both of you

Is it okay to share hard drives with a team-mate?

when I type 9800gtx+ it just shows the 9800gtx scores instead. Not a big deal to me just thought I would let ya know

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=876565 is in question, not missing anything. Screen is a bit garbled but thats because the GPU is a peice of sh1t rofl. Thanks in advance

Just a question for future reference. Say you are running a x500 gpu and gpu-z shows x500/x300 as the card name. I assume you can only submit the results as an x500 correct? Could you run the x300 and post as an x500 being a less powerful card? How do you safeguard against this? Reason I ask is Im a lazy bastard and dont want to switch my WB from my fx3400 to my fx4400 if at all possible lol

lol umm no, OC is stand up guy and would never cheat. I will be beating that score this weekend though stay tuned

I understand, will be back with what they say! Thanks massman for working with me through this. What they told me was that the CPU was read as unkown for some reason they cant publish it. so am I pretty much screwed lol? I mean I could upload the run file to you so you could verify but that would be a b1tch for you.

When I try to make the link public it just goes back to private each time, I think its because the drivers are beta. So no I dont have a link

any news on this?