bartx

I found a bug regarding counting the points, in this case global. I have result at example 3000 marks. I deleted this score and uploaded 3500 marks score. Global points are counted in strange way, like all new points were added to total, not updated. http://hwbot.org/user/bartx/#Points Hwbot says that I have 169,7 global points, but I sumed them manually and total is 151,8.

price drop - 35€

I'm from Poland, probes are not in the box (read first post carefully:) ) and shipped to Switzerland is 45 euros

Voltcraft K102, two channel thermometer. It has been never used (mint condition - no scratches etc.), still has protective film od display (I turned it on with K-probe to check if everything is ok). Probes are not attached. Guarantee not DOA. 40 euros Shipping is 5 euros within Europe. I can ship everywhere. Paypal only.

Simple text edit tweak (it was mentioned before, but as a solution to low scores, not as a tweak): Right click on fmpad.exe in pcmark folder: Turn off desktop and visual themes. Normal score (i5 3470 @ 3.96GHz): Tweaked score It gives 5% gain, not much but still a gain

this issue regards also 4850/70 and 90, even if you have good and bad 4870s paired together, score is crappy too

This Asus pcb is really rare... I've got the same card, not tested yet, but I can't find this pcb on the net or Asus website

I know the rules, but on this card I think that's better to show clocks in Riva Tuner, because GPU-Z doesn't show Geometric clock, only ROP. Here you have all clocks. Also it can't be a SLI run, because it's impossible to run SLI on 169.21 driver...

It's not obvious that it's 256MB 7900GS?

Thanks Now works more than fine.

Can anyone share 173.67 driver for XP/2k with modded inf? I've tried inf enhancer, but it doesn't work good, in some tests fps went higher, in the other I had huge drop (2001 SE). My card needs it so badly, with normal vmod + gamer hud maybe I'll be able to hit 110-112k range. http://hwbot.org/submission/2282995_bartx_3dmark2001_se_geforce_9600_gt_105048_marks Thanks in advance

How do you imagine this split? If I have scores from two ES cpu in my profile, whereas all other has been made on my own hardware am I amateur or pro? On the other hand if somebody doesn't have skills/proper cooling even with bags of cpus from AMD/Intel he won't do anything.

You have to talk with proste71 who is our Team Captain. I'm not able to do this for you.

I see that function "Scores which changed rank recently" is missing. Someone is going to add it soon?

I've found another bugs: - old profile page with generally sucks (using firefox 3.5.6.) - something is wrong with positioning elements on the page - I can't find link to "scores which changed rank recently" though this feature is still available (using link in my history) - I can't check global ranking for wprime/pcmark using 2 cores - only overall global ranking is available I hope that it will help you with troubleshooting

Awesome work. Now it's really worth to bench the most popular hardware. And gaining global points is much easier. Old profile page doesn't work in 1024x768 (on my laptop ) EDIT: And why I'm MSI motherboard fanatic? Should be rather Asus. I've never used MSI boards http://hwbot.org/community/user/bartx?tab=achievements

I think that K404 has a point here. 1500MHz on memory isn't possible on 1ns chips, I've got this card also and something like 1370MHz is max. Most 7800GT cards are reference desing, so probably all have 1ns memory,

Thanks for fixing two scores, but why don't the third one: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=752376 just look at the description - if owner says, that card has 1710 mem clocks it can't be ddr2 card and two more results: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=777965 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=544955 The same issue EDIT: One more: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719200

Bump

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=752376 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=777966 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=554445 All scores - DDR3 card in 7300GT DDR2 category. Please check it

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=750127 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=732603 Scores are blocked, but both were done running default settings - you can't change anything in free version 3DM 2003. In 2001 if you change something, below score is message "Benchmark was not run using default settings" or sth.

Ticket ID: 61 Priority: Medium I noticed, that specification of 9600GSO on hwbot is incorrect. On hwbot, this card has 580/700 clocks and 768MB, but normal 9600GSO has 550/800 clocks and 384MB. On market there are also 768MB versions, but only Palit company produces it. So please fix this/add new category.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699557 - it's looks like a fake to me. Too low clocks for this score - only 750MHz on core. Score is also strange, because for 7900GS usually SM 2.0 score is higher than SM 3.0 score. Used 3dmark is Basic Edition, but I don't remember, that Basic shows score. Maybe this 3d mark is out of date?

But if someone has wide LCD in his notebook, it isn't possible to run 3d mark 2006 in 1280x1024 res, only in 1280x800. Although, it can depends on version of 3d mark - in basic version, you cannot change anything, so then resolution should be standard?

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=700212 - probably running SLI in single card category http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=700214- probably running SLI in single card category