bartx

Awesome work. Now it's really worth to bench the most popular hardware. And gaining global points is much easier. Old profile page doesn't work in 1024x768 (on my laptop ) EDIT: And why I'm MSI motherboard fanatic? Should be rather Asus. I've never used MSI boards http://hwbot.org/community/user/bartx?tab=achievements

I think that K404 has a point here. 1500MHz on memory isn't possible on 1ns chips, I've got this card also and something like 1370MHz is max. Most 7800GT cards are reference desing, so probably all have 1ns memory,

Thanks for fixing two scores, but why don't the third one: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=752376 just look at the description - if owner says, that card has 1710 mem clocks it can't be ddr2 card and two more results: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=777965 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=544955 The same issue EDIT: One more: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719200

Bump

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=752376 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=777966 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=554445 All scores - DDR3 card in 7300GT DDR2 category. Please check it

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=750127 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=732603 Scores are blocked, but both were done running default settings - you can't change anything in free version 3DM 2003. In 2001 if you change something, below score is message "Benchmark was not run using default settings" or sth.

Ticket ID: 61 Priority: Medium I noticed, that specification of 9600GSO on hwbot is incorrect. On hwbot, this card has 580/700 clocks and 768MB, but normal 9600GSO has 550/800 clocks and 384MB. On market there are also 768MB versions, but only Palit company produces it. So please fix this/add new category.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699557 - it's looks like a fake to me. Too low clocks for this score - only 750MHz on core. Score is also strange, because for 7900GS usually SM 2.0 score is higher than SM 3.0 score. Used 3dmark is Basic Edition, but I don't remember, that Basic shows score. Maybe this 3d mark is out of date?

But if someone has wide LCD in his notebook, it isn't possible to run 3d mark 2006 in 1280x1024 res, only in 1280x800. Although, it can depends on version of 3d mark - in basic version, you cannot change anything, so then resolution should be standard?

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=700212 - probably running SLI in single card category http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=700214- probably running SLI in single card category

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687102 - hidden resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686720 - FM link dead http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=663147 - hidden resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622683 - too high score for these clocks and cpu & hidden resolution (probably lowered) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569141 - hidden resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687603 - FM link dead http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640449 - running at not default settings http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=661167 - hidden resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573236 - hidden resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572279 - hidden resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=654035 - hidden resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649591 - hidden resolution

WOW! Faster than QX9650

I found a few scores, which are matched wrong: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634725 And all results from tzwrtzhs's on E6300 added to E2160. He has a lot of scores in this category on E6300 - it isn't only one mistake. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634495 Another score from tzwrtzhs's. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=636258 Maybe now is the time, when for wPrime screen should be also necessary, not only validation, because on the screen everything is visible - some people have problems with matching to correct category. Needs more proof: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641382 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572523 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=596665