Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Leeghoofd

Crew
  • Posts

    13162
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    666

Everything posted by Leeghoofd

  1. Sure, but whats the aim of the game, to go head to head with other 939 users ? I fail to see the reason why we should make rules again more complicated because users want to bench Vantage on a non optimal platform.
  2. K, but why would you use a 939 platform to bench Vantage?
  3. If its PCIe and DDR4 I think there's plenty of subplatform power to make up for the point loss. Now for 05-06 a link is required only for Global top 20 (There's no mention of Systeminfo for the older legacies) Only for Vantage and 11 we require a link and an updated Systeminfo, is that a problem?
  4. yes I asked the changes so the moderators and database pĂȘopel can add it
  5. I would sincerely ask you to tone down Yosi, show some respect. The latest Cat version (ver 2.0) runs pretty smooth in my book. And about the glitching, that in my book is usually user imposed, the same that happened with many other benchmarks. We rate them unsafe, glitchable,... the problem is many times in the chair, not in the computer... If you want to debate, do it at an adult manner and drop the cocky attitude...
  6. we pulled the GPUPIs apart, however the coder didn't give other Hex keys to the datafile so 3.3s are always submitted in the wrong category. This has been added to the rules to submit manually if you want to submit a 3.3 score. GPUPI4.0 is around the corner and will get proper implementation to the HWBOT api
  7. you need to validate the score online with the Advanced key like this
  8. Just propose it in the 3D thread Ronaldo. This thread is about the rules... Users found GPU1B too fast, (yes you can claim +3GHz core clocks) Users nearly crucified me for wanting to introduce Catzilla 4K, but I'll leave it up to you to persuade them to reconsider
  9. Taichi board is added, FTW3 and such has to be hardcoded, we can't add that ourselves, has to be done via the coder
  10. No problem with gpuz here. Which forum are you referring too?
  11. Programmer nailed it, reported page should work again as it supposed to. Kuddos Tim for fixing this!
  12. Thx all for reporting, score is trimmed down to 999 now, so points should be back to be normal...
  13. Thx all for reporting, score is trimmed down to 999 now, so points should be back to be normal...
  14. we want to see your Reported page if it works angelo, the above scores were made by me to follow up
  15. Plz submit manually the GPUPI 3.3 score in the 3.3 category
  16. Currently our programmer Tim is looking at the Reported page bug. Which looks for many like this: While it should look like this: Don't worry if you get emails from a user called Tim or TimTG that reported your score, we are still conducting tests (usually from UAT server, which is the testing environment) What we do want to know is who is affected by this bug? As I checked plenty and only a few have the top screen. Now Tim figured out it is a bad link with the database, but he needs to get some more data to work with. So if you are affected, plz let us know in this thread.
×
×
  • Create New...