Leeghoofd

Well in that case you submit twice with the same CPU so the best score counts

reported to the programmers Mishanya1344

Moderation will be light with CBR20, no problem with the current scres, (if some parts are covered), unless the score is out of whack we would require further proof.

It's always one score per user... Only for dog pile you can go wild

monster cpu bro, well done!!!

in fact we need to see similar info as the CPU-Z CPU (type of CPU, family, socket, FSB Multi, Speed,...), memory ( total, main timings, uncore) and mobo tab (brand and type of board) Benchmate already has most of it onboard The above are required not only for moderation but also for other users to compare scores. The latter is one of the main reasons for the CPUZs

if we want to replace CPUZ the benchmate, the score windows needs to double at least in size, (if not triple) in size for moderation

no FM /UL VALID link

As mentioned before in the several PMs it has already been reported to the developpers/programmers, Only they are aware how high this particular bug is on their priority list. I already did several manual recalcs of all your Team's subs, however it does not help with the achievements or correct ranking. We are no programmers, but moderators and also OCers. There's nothing we (me, Don or George) can do about it than to sit it out and wait till it finally gets fixed. The programmers are having HWBOT as a side project. Whenever time permits they might tinker with it. We all wished this place would be hassle and bug free, sadly that might not gonna happen in the near future even if you are willing to pay for it, it doesn't change a thing....

on fire bro!!!

let me rephrase that for all platforms using Win10 and the BenchMate approved benches. Will Pifast, X265 and Y-Cruncher be added soon ? For the integration keep me posted how it works out with the programmers, that is not my cup of teal....

I sense suspicious score bugging and subbing with a 7740X while notes are on a 7700K But thanks for testing sir. For future purposes we might better to opt to enforce BM to be used for Cinebenches & Geeks on all platforms and OSses

go go Frank

nice memspeed under cold

Yes... Mem validation will be a big mess

Issue is the validation purpose for the given clocks... If cpuz can't make it happen we have another problem with AMDs latest and greatest

Did you have contact with the CPUZ programmer Cookie? Another AMD debacle is not what we need right now...

mellow yellow internal team battle

Moderator changed status from 'null' to 'incorrect submission' - reason: no windows 10 with Ryzen and AM3

R.E.S.P.E.C.T.

same RTC crap bro, win7 is required

special non K bios being used? AVX coding goes down the drain over a certain Bclock (102.8ish) Perfectly could explain why your OCed submission scores way lower than the top scores (at way lower MHz)

the colder you get , the less volts it requires, that remains a basic rule Recap: you seem to surpass a sweet spot for your CPU, which means more volts are required for a smaller MHz gain... only way is either to find a better chip or drop temps drastically. good tip from Avalanche: Try a less memory extensive benchmark like eg cinebench R11.5 or R15 to determine CPU speed scaling I just fear you don't have gems CPUs there, great 9900Ks do 5.4 at way lesser voltages and stock AIO cooling.... Do NOT use big fonts anymore, way too agressive in a forum

reported

Hypers are ideal on P67 chipset boards, Z77 is not optimal (at least comparing Maximus IV versus V, 4dimms rule in efficiency clock per clock