-
Posts
13447 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
710
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by Leeghoofd
-
maybe an Intel and AMD Cheapaz ?
-
Folliwing some discussions on KeepH8n's Discord server it seems Cheapaz needs to make an urgent comeback. Running from 1st of March till end of May One compo with Discrete GPU and one compo with onboard graphics like AMD AM4 3000G CPU Till now we had some proposals on the Discord, but it's easier for me to follow up here. Current standings as they are: AMD 3000G Cheapaz combo (Mix of 2 and 3D stages) AMD HD5770 1GB Cheapaz combo (3D stages only) .... Stages I'll leave that to you
-
FX athlons are expensive and rare to find these days. If we go only with one score I would have to up the amount of stages drastically
-
cnzdrn - Sempron 150 @ 6380MHz - 159 cb Cinebench - R15
Leeghoofd replied to I.nfraR.ed's topic in Result Discussions
Congratz shared on the facebook account -
About motivation and support
Leeghoofd replied to SArd's topic in HWBOT Development: bugs, features and suggestions
HWBot is been taking over by Thermal Grizzly, now once the paperwork is completed the site will have a dedicated programmer who can look into things⦠Till the transaction is completed nothing will move, Expect a transition period of maybe even half a year before things get moving forward... just hold on.... Once things are finalized a press release will pop up.... -
Shared on the HWBot Facebook page ?
-
Updated rules for verification screenshots 2020 from 08/01/2020
Leeghoofd replied to flanker's topic in HWBOT News
CPUZ 1.91 was released on December last year, so it related to newer scores than eg if scores pop up with far older versions of CPUZ. Also the load is higher with 1.91 so validation is not as easy as with older versions sadly -
so I assume it's okay to keep the DDR 1-2-3-4 formula
-
K all, probably early days as we are aiming to host this one around mid June or such, but maybe not bad to take an early start on what the community wants to see regarding stages or benchmarks. We already had some great ideas at Keeph8ans Discord channel, but to keep track of stuff, better start a thread here 3dmark06: DDR: socket 939 limitation DDR2: 2 processor cores and 2 GPU cores (GPU core G80-92) DDR3: 3 processor cores and 3 GPU cores DDR4: 4 processor cores and 4 GPU cores (nVIDIA only) 3dmark99: DDR: AMD CPU and AGP4x/8x DDR2: 2 processor cores, GF 106-116(') cores, Mobos based on nForce chipset DDR3: LGA775 4 cores, 1 video core Unigine Basic: DDR: Socket A platform and nVidia videocard DDR2: 1 CPU core and 2 GPUs in SLI/crossfire DDR3: 2 CPU cores, Geforce 400 family DDR4: AMD APUs only 3DMark03: DDR: socket 478, AGP4x/8x DDR2: 1 CPU core, ATI HD 4000 family DDR3: 6 core CPUs, Geforce 500 family DDR4: CGN 5tgh gen (Vega) 3DMash-up: DDR: Aquamark3: Geforce2 family DDR2: Vantage (GPU score) : ATI HD 2000 DDR3: FireStrike (GPU score) : Intel IGP DDR4: Unigine SuperPosition 8K X265 1080P: DDR: Socket 478 DDR2: Conroe& Woodcrest 4M cpus DDR3: 4cores LGA 1366 DDR4: AM4 only MemFreq: DDR: no socket 939 -- 1024Mb -- Cas 3 DDR2: no socket 771-775 -- 2048Mb -- Cas 5 DDR3: AM3/AM3+ -- 8192Mb -- Cas 10 DDR4: 16348Mb -- Cas 15 SuperPi 32M: DDR: Socket 754 -- 8 multi max DDR2: Quad cores -- 8 multi max DDR3: Zambezi core -- 10 multi max (benchmate) DDR4: no LGA 1200 -- 12 multi max (benchmate) Cinebench 2003: (notebooks & notebook parts only, no desktop CPUs!! GPUPI 3.2 for CPU: DDR: 100M DDR2: 100M -- Allendale 2M DDR3: 1B -- AMD DDR4: 1B Wprime 1024: DDR: Duron processors DDR2: AM2 processors DDR3: Clarkdale processors DDR4: AM4 (benchmate) Ofcourse we can't plz everybody and might rule out too exotic or super expensive (server) hardware https://hwbot.org/competition/team_cup_2020 Let's brainstorm!!
-
Updated rules for verification screenshots 2020 from 08/01/2020
Leeghoofd replied to flanker's topic in HWBOT News
Moderation Team will be flexible and advise users if they still subbed with 1.90...