Leeghoofd

ofcourse I'm biased tried the 1866 divider same low output, ran 03, good score... weird thing is the other bios and the UD7 were tested on the same windows XP. Why did the other benchies scale ? just not 05 ? Running again on the other bench XP right now...

I'll try the different dividers with SLI 05 Andre... keep you guys posted... weird that 3 runs are producing such a low score in SLI...

I hooked up the M4E and I still get a very low score with SLI in 3DMArk05... got no idea what is up... EDIT : OS is borked, reran the tests, other scores remain in line, 05 goes up to 41.3K now

Early results, just quick boot with 2600K SB at 4.5Ghz, Asus GTX480 stock clocks single and in SLI config Gskill Flares 2133 7-9-7-24 Trfc 72 1T WinXP SLI 01 1409 bios : 93483 SLI 01 1596 bios : 96847 +/-3400 points gain.... wOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOt Plus the subtests are displayed properly, no more errors !! other runs are 96760 and 96684 ( 3 runs in a row ) at leasd 3K gain over the previous best socre These are the best runs out of three

Ban Fester Massman , he's got too much money !!! Most aussies have too much cash

coz we know you will spank us all then Christian...

Then you can start to discuss the users that use an Airco to get them little mhz extra out of their GPUs. Pretty hard to prove if they used it or not... plus it uses a compressor too doesn't it A phase change unit is a phase change unit, a watercooling loop at no matter which liquid temps is a watercooled loop... how many will use chilled water ? How many will change the fluid to the special ones that work well beyond sub zero... Plus if you want to be on top you know what to use... Defining sub and positive temps ain't gonna work either as some will always abuse the system... IF you are honest then it won't be aproblem at all, sadly not everyone is like that...

good work Infrared !! Congratz to the winners and runners up !!

Nice score dude , PCMark04 benchmark is all test 3...

There's a trick for it mate, I will tell ya tomorrow ( but we don't have it used it on our runs either as some think of it as a cheat ) One of the other scores have done it the right way... think we could have breached XXXX K easily with the tweak... maybe later a rerun...

why not add benhmarks and remove nothing, so people with older cards can still enjoy the fun of AM3... or whatever benchmark... I'm awaiting GTX68X to beat dino's 275 score....

at least the monitor was l33t

where are your new scores Pete... you have monster CPU too (I guess )

What do you think ? Beating cards under LN2 running at 1000mhz in a pure GPU dependant benchmark... your nature is twice as high as normal... bugged for sure...

me droooooolzzzzzzzz

he's just a shy guy

another FM fail toooooooooo

Good luck Jerre, I sadly can't compete in this round as I don't have any of the older AMD stuff here only witht he 1090T I can try to reproduce a good run , though no idea how pcmark04 works

you can flame at Microsoft, game developpers, driver teams too then Chiller... you will have a busy day on the forums... heck a busy life... Nothing is perfect at release date, nor can it run 100% stable on all possible hardware/software combos from day one... that's eutopia !!

seems a bit up and down with the speed, sometimes I can't get access, sometimes front page and co works fine, forum doesn't... needs some time to settle but looks fab... totally refreshing !!

the one and only, otherwise no piccie like that

Blind... pretty cool he

Nice find Petri, awesome find... does it have Sayaas signature somewhere ? Maybe the best 790 SLI ever made

it's footy now

K404s scores on the first 3 tests scores far better then you, just in nature you pOwn him hard (with far lower clocks) Tweaking via OS, nah.. though kuddos you worked hard to discover it... Rebench eg on XP... and see the difference in subtests... In fact it's not your fault each run is bugged, though as listed above there are discrepancies in your score outcome. Some tests can't score higher than others, but you will discover that quickly when comparing with other scores (see which tests crap out...) Drivers can boost performance, but that doesn't mean ( especially in 3Dmark03 which is very GPU dependant ) that you can surpass guys that run eg 25% faster clocks with decent CPU speeds... and your nature score goes close to ...% faster than anyone elses... doesn't seem logic does it... if you fail to understand ask your dad why that chair is called a chair... he will tell you son, it's like that... I hardly overlook scores, but when I have a similar card and look at the scores and see something weird, then it's normal it will be rectified...