Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

RULE

Members
  • Posts

    561
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by RULE

  1. Very nice. Will be cool see this on skylake Inviato dal mio SM-A300FU utilizzando Tapatalk
  2. You are welcome, as far i can see from your screen your RTL are telling you 50-6/51-6 is possible. Don't force RTL as you like, but try to undestard what mem+board can do. For example if at first retrain, with RTL all AUTO, you have 51-7/58-13, you might consider iol 6 as you lower limit, so CHB 13-7=6 and 58-7=51, leave CHA still AUTO and try to retrain, also a couple of time, sometimes board can adgjust the other CH, if can't try to insert the value you want, considering always 6 as a lower limit. This is not an empirical way, is just my way Also notice from your screen your tRDRD group looks good and also tWRWR_sg 6 is not bad at all. I can't lower down tWRWR_sg to 6 @ 4133.
  3. Bump Inviato dal mio SM-A300FU utilizzando Tapatalk
  4. If you miss my FB post, i'll resume here my early test on tCKE combo. Setup with LiL Yellow, strong retail IMC, strong retail G.Skill mem. Tamb 20°c (my b-die realy like this one) - Cpu under SS - VCCio 1,25v/VCCsa 1,35v So i was sceptical about the real gain on lower TCKE, but look at this: tCKE 5 - tRDRD_sg 6 - tRDRD_dg 4 - tRDRD_dr 6 - tRDRD_dd 6 = 1792 Best out 5 rerun tCKE 4 - tRDRD_sg 6 - tRDRD_dg 4 - tRDRD_dr 4 - tRDRD_dd 4 = 1778 Best out 5 rerun tCKE 4 - tRDRD_sg 6 - tRDRD_dg 4 - tRDRD_dr 3 - tRDRD_dd 3 = 1787 Best out 5 rerun tCKE 4 - tRDRD_sg 6 - tRDRD_dg 5 - tRDRD_dr 5 - tRDRD_dd 6 = 1792 Best out 5 rerun As you can see tCKE can be efficient, just need to tweak around the other tminigs accordingly, tCKE 4 is always a bit unstable for me, 5 is overall more stable. tCKE 3 is very hard to bootup, and too much unstable to compare. Not a mem engineer but sounds like: tRDRD_sg tRDRD_dg can't go any lower for me tRDRD_dr tRDRD_dd best choice 5-5 (with tCKE 4)/ 6-6 (with tCKE 5) MRC Fast Boot = Disable - can be your friend Need to retest with SPI32, because you know xtu hit at some point efficiency limit and you can't see if scale in performance anymore.
  5. Bump 450€ shipped EU should be a very reasonable price Inviato dal mio SM-A300FU utilizzando Tapatalk
  6. Bump Inviato dal mio SM-A300FU utilizzando Tapatalk
  7. Bump Inviato dal mio SM-A300FU utilizzando Tapatalk
  8. What u mean? Inviato dal mio SM-A300FU utilizzando Tapatalk
  9. Bump Inviato dal mio SM-A300FU utilizzando Tapatalk
  10. I can't check 'cause ATM i don't have Asus board at home, but i'm pretty sure of what i'm saying, doesn't matter what can u set in bios. If u can check try to boot at 100.06 and read the frequency with hwinfo. Can i be wrong i'm human after all, but please stop flamming and try to turn this into a vendors war.
  11. Hi, i'm try to resell my best i7 6700k The cpu is a pre-tested from Caseking, if you don't know much about that can follow this link for more info:http://forum.hwbot.org/showthread.php?t=150581 As you can see in pictures the cpu was pretested for 6426mhz HwBot Prime - No CB - CBB around -175°c I was able to take: -6400mhz Cinebench 11.5 Overclocking, overclocking, and much more! Like overclocking. -6400mhz wprime 32 Overclocking, overclocking, and much more! Like overclocking. -6400mhz hwbotprime Overclocking, overclocking, and much more! Like overclocking. I'm not much a 3D guy so not much to show you, i've try quick aquamark and 6600mhz is possible, also light 2d the same. The cpu have also a strong IMC good for 4080c12 with b-die (can you check facebook or hwbot) and very good for max memory frequency: http://hwbot.org/submission/3231410_rule_memory_clock _ddr4_sdram_2470.4_mhz I've done also some AIO test (with Raijintek Triton 3x120), if someone was interested in good cpu for daily or liquid cooling benchmarck: -4700Mhz CPU/4000Mhz Cache - 1,260v Prime95 1344k 30minuts http://imgur.com/8MBoW8Q -4800Mhz CPU/4000Mhz Cache - 1,310V Prime95 1344k 30minuts http://imgur.com/W1Onuk9 -4900Mhz CPU/4000Mhz Cache - 1,375V Prime95 1344k 30minuts http://imgur.com/od3Ix5Q -4800Mhz CPU/4800Mhz Cache + 2x8GB with 3600Mhz XMP 1,39V Prime95 1344k 30minuts (Strong Daily) http://imgur.com/cXvdZGZ -5000Mhz CPU/5000Mhz Cache - 1,475V Wprime32 http://imgur.com/aKwOnKO The CPU is located in Italy Asking 450€ shipped within EU, for outside EU contact me i'll give u a quote. Paypal (as a friend) or BankTrasfer Cheers
  12. This collateral damage may shift the focus of memory performance on xtu a well know bugged benchmark. What about video prof with cpuz open, will affect just the efficiency of the benchmark not also the performance of the memory and will be the very same handicap for everyone. Inviato dal mio SM-A300FU utilizzando Tapatalk
  13. Wrapper? No man please we can't kill best benchmark stand. U know wrapper means net framwork and probably we can't run so tight with mem like now. Inviato dal mio SM-A300FU utilizzando Tapatalk
  14. There's 2 solution, killing our efficiency with a software like hwinfo running during the benchmark or video proof with all the system, not just screen. And since are we talking about all LLC is time to kill XTU, for have a good score I need temp throttling? Realy? Time to introduce geekbench instead. Inviato dal mio SM-A300FU utilizzando Tapatalk
  15. Is not about point, but respect! I always run 100.067 on MOCF because I have strougle to boot up at 100.000, still in a perfect world should be like 5003.35, but there's also some freq fluttuation. The asus guy should be 100.00 because the first step after is 100.125 so 5006.25 In 4080 scenario is the same 102.125x49=5004.125 Total agree with big fella we need a solution Inviato dal mio SM-A300FU utilizzando Tapatalk
  16. Nop, not much time and no ln2 atm. #1 is sold Inviato dal mio SM-A300FU utilizzando Tapatalk
  17. You are crazy not once but twice 742? a lot of patience, or is more easy on gigabyte?
×
×
  • Create New...