Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

I.nfraR.ed

Members
  • Posts

    2473
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    36

Everything posted by I.nfraR.ed

  1. And it doesn't like higher voltage at all, makes it sick. I have one more coming (1209PGT).
  2. They all look almost the same. I was able to get 4.5 at 1.675 or something. Try one core, it might allow the first one validate higher. I was not able to do anything good with more than 2 cores, although two of the others seemed better.
  3. Yes, it was the same for me. Basically was able to go one notch up on the htt for like 30MHz higher and didn't bother trying again, probably 6.68 - 6.7 being the limit.
  4. The weather is too hot, otherwise chip should do 2800+ on water. Testing efficiency mainly, but there are like 7sec I need to shave off. Know how to drop 2 more, but not 7.
  5. Very nice cpu. Can't beat these core and cpu-nb clocks
  6. Kinda expected with the clocks I was running. Going to rerun next week, hopefully can save the screenshot.
  7. Got 2h 52m and the system restarted when I tried to set the background picture before the screenshot.
  8. Nice Much better than my old score on similar frequency.
  9. Seriously...I wanted to kill it. 20l of LN2 and not a single 32M result. Not exact in round, not convergent in sqr, crashing of superpi... Most of the time couldn't pass 3rd loop. Finished one time at 6640 and bsoded on the screenshot, while it's perfectly fine on these speeds before superpi. I can freely mess with tools, change settings, etc. I even do cdt on these speeds. As I said before, it's a very weird cpu...
  10. If all of them do that, it's most probably the board coldbugging. My Crosshair IV does the same and I think only works full pot with one dimm slot populated. Yes, but not sure if the board or the cpu is the problem, however this board has proven stable full pot with my 1090T and old 955 C3. Might be a bios problem, cause it flashed automatically from the backup bios after running full pot for a while. It worked 4 cores no problem with stock hsf afterwards, so I assumed it's the cpu.
  11. Seems all 3 chips mentioned here have weak memory subsystem and odd behavior. But cores clock good after all and that's what matters most and can easily compensate for the low cpu-nb and mem.
  12. Nice cpu, but you need to work on efficiency. Beats my 6000+ by a mile.
  13. Second and fourth cores are better than the first on my chip, but since it works on 1 core only, I can't test them properly. After drying the board I tried it on stock again and it was working on 4 cores.
  14. Nope, haven't started with Ivy yet, but hopefully will test it on LN2 next week. Only 32M on water with high ambient temp (29 -30°C) - 4.6GHz 1.55V, didn't try more. But cpu-nb and imc are weak, e.g. can't do 3GHz and 940MHz 6-6-6-18.
  15. Yes, 1210PGT. Same here for the cpu-nb, can't do 3GHz on water...
  16. yes, htt wall. -16 is actually ok for these, it could have been worse...like 0. Don't know why, but with the ram freezed I couldn't reach the same htt, so the run is done with air cooled ram.
  17. I guess it's allowed since last CountryCup when scores that used it were not removed. After that many people use it (including myself). It's like setting 4 threads in wprime on a dualcore.
  18. Uhm, you know I'm not done yet But yeah, I don't stand a chance against good chips with 2x1024 L2 cache. 3rd place here will be ok for me.
×
×
  • Create New...