I.nfraR.ed

There are no AM2+/AM3 boards At least AM2 boards' cpu support list stops at X2 models (Brisbane/Windsor). On the other hand, s.939 is not included .

Haven't seen anyone raised that question. I wonder why there are global points for 5x, 6x, 8x, 12x and so on number of cores? Hardware points - ok, but as I've read somewhere PCMark05 utilizes up to 4 cores. It's not like wprime. Correct me if I'm wrong here. So, a guy with "1 of 1" score in unpopular category still gets full global points. He can even run at stock, the outcome would be the same. On the other hand if you manage to score 4th in a tough category like wprime1024 with a single core processor, you get less points. How fair is that? Well, if there are not global points for these kind of systems, they would be not appealing for submissions, that's also true. Not going against anyone personally. If there are flaws, they will be always exploited. Just sharing my thoughts. I'm not even a points collector, I just do it mostly for fun. In my opinion there should be global points for PCMark05 as a whole, but not based on core count.

Here it is http://hwbot.org/submission/2260449_i.nfrar.ed_pifast_athlon_64_4200_x2_manchester_35.83_sec All these 2D scores with that cpu were single sucessful runs, I'm sure they can be improved further, especially wprime. Haha, yes . Soon you'll have to buy other models as well, lol. You can see my temp at the first photo from submissions with the Manchester. Need to bench properly all these s.939 cpus in the box. Some of them seem very decent. Most of them are single cores though.

Oh, I disassembled everything yesterday, because I need to focus on the Gigabyte challenge. But I can use water cooling anyday LN2 is a little different story - I pay more for the taxi then the actual LN2 cost . And I have only 15L dewar, that is borrowed from a friend. But...if your challenge is interesting, I would accept it

Yeah, It doesn't work for me with 1090T as well. I've never ran PCMark05 seriously, but wanted to try those transparent windows tweaks. Well, I tried it on my 24/7 system, so that might be the problem, but I see gains from mouse moving only.

Congrats Honda! You did great even with AMD

So I won at one thing - my cpu went down to -80C, otherwise it's a poor overcklocker on air/water Either I suck at 06, or I needed 3.7GHz to compensate for the twice as much L2 cache you have guys?

Nice bios version

Only black ninja can beat him Managed to beat all X2 4200+ Manchester scores, except wprime 32 and 1024. 15L of LN2 are not enough.

I can't beat that with gtx280 @ 837/1674/1404, lol

2 cores, 3.5GHz each...that's 7GHz, lol

I can't even get close to you, guys At least that 4200+ Manchester is good (3520 for 3D).

Yeah, I don't see it happening 106 fps at HDR1 is way too much for my system.

Damn, can't beat this with GTX280

Seems like reference design. Great clocks, not many people able to push that far. Great score as well.

How..with massive airflow and cold ambients, I guess

Yeah, thats what I rely on

I give you the responsibility to decide whether it's a lucky draw or the highest ranked air/water overclocker out of the top-3 . The latter is better, imo. All I want to see from the competition is some records broken. Hopefully someone will achive this. It won't be me, I don't have records-capable chips.

If I manage to get some of the top 3 places (very very unlikely, imo), I would give my prize to a lucky draw between air/water guys. I don't even have AM3+ motherboard myself, but it doesn't matter . Now, let's see some serious air/water results! PS: Uh, maybe it should be given to the best air/water guy overall, otherwise I don't encourage pushing hard, but only participating, lol. So, let it be "the top air/water guy (not in top 3) gets it"

Nice one. Still not tried to improve my score, but hey...2 more days left

Hey, there are plenty of OCers registered in 1970 (including me), so it must be some of them

Let it be colbugged, let it be...(rofl) Seriously, I might not have a chance if it clocks good under SS . All my duals are locked.

Nooooooo!

WTF, saw some of your videos...you're advetising registration to some online game? In fact the benchmark had been ran at 640x480 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjHHMcElCwE&list=UUI8HC7Dfxwt2n4lOnPKo8eg&index=9&feature=plcp?

Where's the video? The resolution benchmark had been run at is not visible. According to the rules it should be visible in the screenshot. Again, see the rules for this benchmark: http://hwbot.org/news/875_application_2_rules/