I.nfraR.ed

I give you the responsibility to decide whether it's a lucky draw or the highest ranked air/water overclocker out of the top-3 . The latter is better, imo. All I want to see from the competition is some records broken. Hopefully someone will achive this. It won't be me, I don't have records-capable chips.

If I manage to get some of the top 3 places (very very unlikely, imo), I would give my prize to a lucky draw between air/water guys. I don't even have AM3+ motherboard myself, but it doesn't matter . Now, let's see some serious air/water results! PS: Uh, maybe it should be given to the best air/water guy overall, otherwise I don't encourage pushing hard, but only participating, lol. So, let it be "the top air/water guy (not in top 3) gets it"

Nice one. Still not tried to improve my score, but hey...2 more days left

Hey, there are plenty of OCers registered in 1970 (including me), so it must be some of them

Let it be colbugged, let it be...(rofl) Seriously, I might not have a chance if it clocks good under SS . All my duals are locked.

Nooooooo!

WTF, saw some of your videos...you're advetising registration to some online game? In fact the benchmark had been ran at 640x480 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjHHMcElCwE&list=UUI8HC7Dfxwt2n4lOnPKo8eg&index=9&feature=plcp?

Where's the video? The resolution benchmark had been run at is not visible. According to the rules it should be visible in the screenshot. Again, see the rules for this benchmark: http://hwbot.org/news/875_application_2_rules/

Where's your details screen? Other important information is missing as well. See the rules here: http://hwbot.org/news/874_application_1_rules/

Not that nice, but ok chip. Freaks out when trying to complete Pi32M even at 3050. HC, your cpu seems awesome! Never had s.939 cpu that is so ht ref. limited.

... when you realize it's time for work and you've benched all the night long, telling yourself several times "one more run and then I go to bed" ... ... when arriving at the office the first thing you do is open hwbot and upload scores, then thinking all day long what you can do to improve your score in the evening ...

Thanks. Lacking efficiency though. Anyway, need to finally test all these s.939 CPUs in the box.

Sorry, but that's not the correct wprime version. Download the required version here: http://hwbot.org/benchmarks/processor

Yep, you should be considered lucky if it runs below -40C My Opteron 165 doesn't run under 0C

Does it make good contact with the case? If not, I'm afrad you need to mod it with the heavy hammer... You can alternatively add another one on the outside of the RIGHT door of the case. Don't ask which one, you should figure it out yourself, otherwise it won't work. Make sure there's enough TIM applied. It will drop your side panel temperature with up to 5*C ! You can even put the panel aside from the case, the temperature of the panel will drop even further.

Strong score, awesome work!

Not that bad Yeah, I guess you wanted 8GHz, but it might happen next time.

Really nice, considering the cpu. Need to get mine out and see if it works . However your GT1 seems higher than expected.

Great That;'s the cpu you told me about, right?

Yes, I think your files should be threads/2, but no less than 2! So in case you have Gulftown, you need to produce 6 files, not 3 like with Thuban. About the smoking hdd - keep in mind you should not copy them too fast or your hdd will get hot and eventually burn. I had blown a usb flash drive this way and lost my 8.7GHz validation It was the "cut" step. On high-end intel system you need to wait more time between copy/cut operations, because the cpu is faster than amd cpu. Makes sense, huh?

Massman said it's still required, no change about this rule. You might have missunderstood his response. Преведено: "Не, изискването за линк остава. Последвалият отговор беше във връзка с оплакване, че 3DMark03 не дава линк, но с последната версия работи както трябва."

All my s.A results on air are done with this cooler. Great one.

In my opinion the line is very thin, but reselling a part to other overclocker is a little bit different. The main difference is that the first owner got the part from a shop or as a free sample from manufacturer/sponsor. Then he sells it to another person who may or may not submit results to hwbot. In many cases you can't even know if it had been used for benches in hwbot or not. The other situation that applies to those 2 guys is somehow different. err0r didn't buy the hardware for himself first, as I understood from the explanation, but pre-benched the cards and then sent to the intended owner. However it's not the obvious hardware sharing like "hey, give me your card, I want to bench 3DMark06 and submit a score. Then I'll give it back to you". That's why I asked if I decide someday to sell some of my cards, let's say in a local hardware forum, would it be a problem if a teammate buys it from me? What happens if some other guy buys it and after some times resells it to my teammate? Are all these hardware sharing? You could have easily hide that fact, but it shows that you're honest overclockers. Big respect for that and for all great scores. I hope err0r won't be too upset and just produce even better scores with different cards.

I don't know, Chris (rofl)

I've always liked your scores, it's clear that a lot of hard work is done on all of them. Winter this year seems to be generous to overclockers in Bulgaria and Romania, doesn't it?