Christian Ney

very nice, imo windows XP is better

WoW thank you, I didn't know. I am speechless. That's why everybody was thinking my submission was bad

What is powertoy ? And how to use a program as PCMark is going to abort tests if you leave his window ? For me it seems impossible to cheat with PCMark, do you have a proof or a video ?

Me, I love his english accent

not same clock, and celeron is without HT and P4 is with HT. It wasn't plan to hide the score, I was tired after 63 runs, as the system was unstable I quickly opened cpu-z and gpuz to take a screenshot. Now, I have seen that I have less sub-scores than evocarlos, so there is something weird here. So I rerun PCMark05 but with 300 mhz FSB, and the score is around 12000 WoW, I thing one of the multithreading test was bugged for my 13000s submissions, as often the audio compressions test was failing, maybe this time he bugged so it gave me higher score.( or an other end test ) => I am going to remove 13000s score right now. You all were right, thank you. Regards ( and sorry for that, I was thinking that when a test was going wrong, it just failed, not bugged )

Same system and you can see the HDD general usage : http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1063085_christian_ney_pcmark_2005_celeron_lga775_352_10831_marks Benched few hours before

CrystalDiskMark is not illegal, and I don't know any tweaks for PCMarks.

Thx, I was still using CrystalDiskMark to reduce the test @ 220MB/s, but it's rare to have 220Mb/s, very often 230Mb/s. Anyway I am going to have a ''rules ok'' result ASAP EDIT : Even a better result than Evocarlos , back to the lead (of stage 1 )

I know, arf, for 0.326 mb/s. Damn, I know that my P4 630 is hating me like hell by now. I am going to do another 10 runs.

Ticket ID: 1065 Priority: Low CPU-Z :\r\nhttp://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1425794\r\n\r\nLink :\r\n\r\nhttp://img256.imageshack.us/img256/325/pcchipsm810lr.jpg\r\n\r\nThx

220 ==== 220.326 Maybe it increased the score of 2 pts. I can submite 13000 if you want. Please I am benching this CPU since 6 hours

Yep, damn with 307mhz it's not ok, but 306 yes. AND AFTER 58 RUNs, I got the score. It's not the WR but .... http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1063182_christian_ney_pcmark_2005_pentium_4_630_13002_marks?new=true (I have half reached the challenge you gave me)

Ticket ID: 1064 Priority: Low Here is the CPU-Z link :\r\nhttp://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1425668\r\n\r\nHere is a pic :\r\n\r\nhttp://img181.imageshack.us/img181/4489/img2006.jpg\r\n\r\nthx

Is 233MB/s allowed . Damn with the P4 630 I can't go down more than 230. EDIT : Damn reached to go down to 217MB/s but the audio compression test failed at the end.

Thx,(from you it a very important ''Well done'') I am benching the Pentium 4 630 by now, but I don't know why, He already done PCMark05 @ 4.6 and now I am only able to run 4.35. Damn maybe it's the wrong 630 (I have 3 Pentium 4 630)

LOL

Was impossible for me to have better RAM clock with this CPU/MB

Now time to bench the pentium 4 630

Like if you kill the puss in boots. BTW : I have the right pic for this thread

I am against too, even if some people hates rev4 changes it s not the right way to kill hwbot puppy. ( I was afraid seeing the pic). Anyway, if you look at my posts/reply I am always joking on massman, because I love massman(professional relationship). I love his videos, comments an his high capacity to underclock. But, man how did you kill the puppy, that's very sad

ok, no problems

Can we report submissions with images errors, to let you know that there is errors(not for blocking them) ?

Can you show us the details window that we can see which test failed.

GG duck

Ticket ID: 1062 Priority: Low Here is the link :\r\nhttp://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1421253\r\n\r\nthx