Christian Ney

Add the fact that D3D T&L and compressed textures are limitations that are allowed by the rules. So Why not the other ones for oldest cards ?

Totally agree (want aircooled league maybe i can be first)

Anyway, seems to be a nice rev, good job

Hell Yeah

Maybe he really stolen it

A question How did he get the pic as there is no media on elmor's submission ?

He is using Performance preset, cause you can see the P before the score

Ticket ID: 1031 Priority: High Here is the CPU-Z link :\r\nhttp://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1393007\r\n\r\nHere is a good pic of the card :\r\nhttp://www.shuttle.eu/_archive/older/en/prod/mb/600/mv43vn.jpg

Me too, thx for the solution

Ticket ID: 1029 Priority: Low Here is the link :\r\nhttp://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1296380\r\n\r\nI know it\'s the name of the all system but CPU-Z reconise it like a Optiplex GX150

and crazy too

you are a killer

Ticket ID: 1022 Priority: High thx

Ticket ID: 1021 Priority: High Here is the GPU-Z screenshot :\r\nhttp://img412.imageshack.us/img412/2843/prosavage48a26.gif

Everything's fine, the fact is I don't want to aim any moderator, he is not the only one I have seen with an ''hardware limited'' card result.

Report only if the score looks weird ( according to the GPU/CPU ), and also if it's not too old.

For who doesn't understand what is ''FPS breakdown'' it's the ''details window'' of the result that is showing the average FPS for each GT( Game Tests )

np

@ 1Day There is a lot of cards, but I will show you only one for exemple : http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1021987_christian_ney_3dmark_2003_radeon_7000_sdr__radeon_ve_sdr_39_marks

True, I have to change the world opinion into ''way'', maybe it would be better

That's true no doubt, but now one other issue is coming out, what about cards that are able to run only few GT, and not all due to "hardware limitations". These scores are allowed it runed at defaults quality settings but not default benchmark settings as one or two tests has been skipped due to hardware limitation

So Thor's opinion is to keep everything unchanged ( choice n°3 ) or remove ''3D tab'' for ''Hardware limited'' cards ( choice n°1 ) and of course keep ''2D tab''

unigine is part of the ALL, :D, ok you win this round, but that cant be consider here because 3DMark01 is the first BenchMark and these card we are talking about are too old so then can only run the first benchmark of the website which is 3DMark01. Maybe before 2001 they were other benchmarks that these cads were able to run at default settings, I am too young to know, but if yes, so they also can run all anterior benchmarks. Like you said for unigine and DX9.

If we consider Unigine as a DX11 Benchmark ( Which it is), yes they are limited

Of cours they can be here for 2D(CPU) scores but as we can submite with them for 3D, there is nowhere where it is said "Do not submite 3D scores with this card because it cannot run default settings". And as we want to overclock, and as they can run 3DMark01 (even if it's not at default setting ) I think you've already done that with Unigine Benchmark ( default settings is DX11, and you allowed DX9 card to run it (in a differente cathegory BTW). I know it's a bad exemple but it's the same. Why are you allowing DX9 card to continue living, and not "Hardware limited" cards ?