Christian Ney

ok, I haven't check

Just clic on the report button(on the option tab of the entry) and say "has to be changed from celron 2.3ghz to celron 2.1ghz" and then a moderator will move the entry

Thx

Is this a challenge you give me, ok, My objective is to break the WR with this CPU right now. done, sorry, I was on the iphone, now I am back to a computer

What is the problem to exceed 220 mo/s ? the objective is to have the better score isn't it ? My P4 630 with HT @ 4.6 Ghz on air EDIT1 : Just read the rules OMG, after hardware limited cards, there is benchmark scores limitations LOL. Strange I have seen submissions with a lot more than 220 mo/s (like 275 mo/s and sometimes more). EDIT2 : I am going to do massman's tweak : copy big file recopy big file another big file start PCMark05 then the score is : 8mb/s like my very old IBM IDE 4 Go HDD EDIT3 : ADVERTISING : ( work for Thor941 again ) I am going to check(and report as i am not a moderator) a lot of PCMark05 results. Be careful. The hunting is open EDIT4 : Hunting closed for today, seems that submissions I have seen with more than 220 mo/s has already been removed. Good to see that cleaning was done before my hunting

Is it interesting to buy 10 OCZ Vertex 2 ? to break the PCMark05 1xCPU WR ? on my Asus Commando and 3 additional SATA RAID controlers ? What can I reach ? ( xxx Mo/s ) on XP stratup

Look at my video, even if in my own opinion it shouldn't be allowed

in the video I am saying "100 %" in french sorry,its "one hundred"

100 Legit entry : http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1061427_christian_ney_pcmark_2005_pentium_4_630_9196_marks

Will add real pics of the rig tonight

IMPORTANT Watch at the video

Ticket ID: 1061 Priority: High You just add this card yesterday, thx, but when I submitted with it, it\'s written as 3DFX and not Gigabyte. Has to be fixed. Thx

Never say never(ever here) I have runed some vantage x1 to have WR (not for the fastest of course, for the slowest). And I am sure that massman also did some, he is better than me on underclocking.

sure, but the actual owner of the WR can easily win the competition

I laughed for about 10 mins(cause I have seen the video 10 times)

it's allowed to use an old score ? So we can use actual WR ?

Wanted to say 3DMark not PCMark. Anyway I have also bought PCMark Vantage, the free version is a fake, only one use and no score

Arf too late I have already bought PCMark vantage EDIT : 3DMark Vantage*

most impressive : it works good

SF3D : you have competition here : http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1061029_christian_ney_cpu_z_pentium_mmx_200mhz_233_mhz?new=true

Best water cooling ever

Ticket ID: 1059 Priority: High Here is the CPU-Z link :\r\n\r\nhttp://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1417278\r\n\r\nThx

Thx, I wanted to bench the i486 DX, but my compaq board is dead, I am trying to find an another one

Got about 30 Pentium MMX 166

I am going to push it @ 312 Mhz If I can