Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

xsuperbgx

Members
  • Posts

    110
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by xsuperbgx

  1. Not trying to be a pest, but how about a quick description on how to do this? I was hoping to integrate this for an ongoing forum contest. If all we are waiting on is a full documentation write up, then a quick list of commands and a couple examples would likely be enough to figure out what I need. Thanks!
  2. You have a great CPU there. I have been buying CPU's and boards so that I can improve my single core scores. I only hope that I can get anywhere close to this. Good work!
  3. Is there going to be documentation/ development on this soon?
  4. I thought there was going to be some changes to the way that global points are awarded to rarely used core counts in cpu benchmarks? With the addition of cinebench, perhaps this would be more urgent. It seems that there are quite a few submissions recently that seem to be taking advantage of (abusing) the current situation.
  5. Could I get clarification? Is screenshot required when futuremark link is given? If so, at what date did that take effect? I/E: after which date are submissions required to have screensot wth 2x cpuz, gpuz and details?
  6. Why are my scores so low on this? There seems to be a big difference in scores, is there something else that effects the scores? There are people that are scoring almost 2x my score at the same clocks. I have tried w7 32 and 64. I tried downloading xtu profiles, but they don't make any difference. Memory speed doesn't seem to make that large of a difference. What am I missing? 4770k and M6G.
  7. I think there were similar pictures before the bulldozer release.
  8. When will this be coming? How about a couple quick examples of the new functionality?
  9. How about this? I would like to seperate by cores. Another thing that would be nice, is to seperate by specific hardware. Like we could show 4770k ranks in our 4770k results thread.
  10. Should be {HWBOT=team=PC_Games_Hardware,XTU,39]teamrank[/HWBOT} with proper [ and ] [hwbot=overclockers.com,XTU,20]teamrank[/hwbot]
  11. You said allowed here, but I cannot submit my previous result. http://hwbot.org/submission/2355412_
  12. how about 2.8 200 northwood? http://hwbot.org/submission/2355412_
  13. A final word now would be good. Either allow the 200fsb north woods with ht or disallow. I have yet to run this on ln2, so I would like to run only once and not worry about being dq'd. The lack of obvious decision is a bit frustrating. I asked about this 1 month ago: http://hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=232056&postcount=51
  14. Could you clarify the northwood cpu's, that the only cpu with HT allowed is 3.06ghz. There is at least one cpu submission with 2 threads(not a 3.06).
  15. I would like clarification here, also. So I can know if I need to get a different card. Could qx6700 be added to sc2 conroe?
  16. Was the small graph that showed user points history removed or did I lose it?
×
×
  • Create New...