cbjaust

Great overclock on the CPU, nice one mate!

That's a great result on air cooling, well done. What are you cooler is on the CPU?

Does that mean the intention is to have the categories as per GPU? Searching submissions is confusing though because for instance searching for say GeForce 9 series in 2001 SE and selecting 1 for the amount gives the results with the 9800GX2 results at the top of the list but it is excluded when you change the amount to 2 where it the 9800 GTX (+) that tops the listing. it appears that the description will say 2 x 'Card Name' when it has two GPUs but it ranks as if its a single card... As an example is it the intention "2x GeForce 9800 GX2" and "2x GeForce 9800 GTX(+)" (both 2x G92 GPUs) to be ranked together in the future? My opinion is that the categories should be per card but describe the card so it is stated to have 2 GPUs like maybe "1x GeForce 9800 GX2 (2x G92), or something. Cheers

I'll give it a go. I've put Win98SE on it now for Fury Maxx AFR... but i'll try in SuperPi in Win98SE. Thanks

there appears to be some inconsistency with multiple gpu graphics cards. For example how are havli`s 3DMark 99 Max score: 8347 marks with a Rage Fury MAXX and kotori`s 3DMark 99 Max score: 9441 marks with a Rage Fury MAXX in the 1 x Rage Fury Maxx category when scores such as kotori`s 3DMark 99 Max score: 11715 marks with a Rage Fury MAXX are listed as 2 x Rage Fury Maxx when in all cases the scores were made with a single Rage Fury Maxx which happens to have 2 GPUs on the one card. I've seen other examples as well, like the nVidia GeForce 7950GX2 like zzolio`s Aquamark score: 342138 marks with a GeForce 7950 GX2 listed as 2 x when its just a single card... What is the rule, because in the case of the Fury Maxx, all of the results should be in one category but they are not. Cheers

ha, ok. Should be a contravention of the rules

Howcome you underclocked the PIII 1000E mate?

where did you find a Geode 1250?

ah, yes, forgot about that, nevertheless pinmodding on nForce2 worked for me. Not much use for raising multi apart from 200MHz FSB CPUs as far as I can see...

cheers

Pinmod to the socket of a Gigabyte GA-7N400S-L which comes pretty neutered from factory worked for me on a TBredB 2600+ (AXDA2600DKV3C JIUHB 0345MPM), see here for example using x12 where the stock multi is x16: "][/url]

Yeah, I would have deleted it already as I didn't save a screenshot of that run back in the day because of the automatic verification which worked back then. I soon started to take screenshots though. Anyway, I can't edit or delete the result for some reason (see screenshot) so would you please delete the submission for me?

I've been having the same problem, for 3DMark2001 SE can we use a CPUz version that doesn't cause issues?

This time its cbjaust`s SuperPi - 1M score: 48sec 630ms with a Turion 64 X2 TL-50 (Taylor). It's the blank screen bug after clicking the Edit Submission button at the bottom of the edit submission page... I guess it's some kind of chipset mismatch asn I've had this bug previouly.

OK, will do. Thanks

Ah, yes well i would delete the result except there are no options for edit or delete in the report or moderate section even when I'm logged in, see screenshot:

because I can't get the mainboard (DFI LANParty UT nF4 SLI-D) to show up... I only have the mainboard and cooling fields available in the mainboard Details Section... hwbot.org/submission/815371_cbjaust_wprime___1024m_opteron_170_16min_17sec_610ms thanks

I like the GPU cooler on the north bridge!

Yeah, I didn't see any of the pre-comp discussion and I didn't have it in my mind to go dual socket. I suppose if I had A dual Socket Board I would have thought about it!

This is really disappointing for those of us who don't have dual socket boards. I think the comp rules should be per CPU - I guess they didn't think of the existence of Dual Socket A boards.

Whay can't I edit this submission? cbjaust`s wPrime - 1024m score: 13min 51sec 940ms with a Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (Windsor) Actually I just wanted to delete it as I don't have a screenshot anyway since this was made in the days when the wPrime submit result functionality worked...

OK, thanks for helping out and giving me the tip.

for cbjaust`s PCMark05 score: 7304 marks with a Opteron 170 I want to add: Processor Reference/IMC/QPI clock: 285/2851/1140 Batch nr: CCB1E 0609FPAW Videocard Shader clock: 1728 Manufacturer: Point of View Motherboard Manufacturer: DFI Model: LANParty UT nF4 SLI-DR Cooling: Air (Stock) Memory Manufacturer: Corsair Product: XMS Cooling: Air (Stock) IC type: XMS3502v1.3 0607310-1 Validation Compare url: http://www.users.on.net/~cbjaust/images/OSA170DAA6CD%20PCMark05%207304%20Marks%20HP%20at%202851-259%20&%20648-1728-1044%208800GTS%20640.png Reason for change: fix compare url and add minor detail

It's just a bunch of detail for completion's sake... for cbjaust`s PCMark05 score: 7751 marks with a Opteron 170 I want to add: Processor Reference/IMC/QPI clock: 329/2961/987 Batch nr: CCB1E 0609FPAW Videocard Shader clock: 1728 Manufacturer: Point of View Motherboard Manufacturer: DFI Model: LANParty UT nF4 SLI-DR Cooling: Air (Stock) Memory Manufacturer: Corsair Product: XMS tCAS: 2.5 Cooling: Air (Stock) IC type: XMS3502v1.3 0607310-1 Validation Compare url: http://www.users.on.net/~cbjaust/images/OSA170DAA6CD%20PCMark05%207751%20Marks%20HP%20at%202961-247%20&%20648-1728-1044%208800GTS%20640.png Reason for change: fix compare url and add minor detail That's it for that one... PS I just tried to edit the submission again and still no go, same blank page

thanks for the idea, I'll try the chrome. edit: same problem in chrome.