cbjaust

thanks, for getting rid of the Direct CU II but only one went to ATI, the others turned into AMD or stayed ASUS... (I wouldn't mind but I've got a heap of submissions with the 5970 and I made them all ATI and I only have the one card) ASUS: http://hwbot.org/submission/3844042_cbjaust_vrmark___orange_room_radeon_hd_5970_1150_marks AMD: http://hwbot.org/submission/3844320_cbjaust_3dmark___cloud_gate_radeon_hd_5970_37523_marks http://hwbot.org/submission/3844053_cbjaust_vrmark___blue_room_radeon_hd_5970_159_marks http://hwbot.org/submission/3844065_cbjaust_3dmark___fire_strike_ultra_radeon_hd_5970_425_marks

Hi there, I accidentally made my ATI Radeon HD 5970 an ASUS Radeon HD 5970 Direct CU II in five submissions and when I edit them to change from ASUS to ATI as the video card brand and remove Direct CU II from the model, the edits do not stick. I deleted and resubmitted one score but that's not really optimal... The remaining 4 submissions that I want to change are these: http://hwbot.org/submission/3844320_cbjaust_3dmark___cloud_gate_radeon_hd_5970_37523_marks http://hwbot.org/submission/3844042_cbjaust_vrmark___orange_room_radeon_hd_5970_1150_marks http://hwbot.org/submission/3844053_cbjaust_vrmark___blue_room_radeon_hd_5970_159_marks http://hwbot.org/submission/3844065_cbjaust_3dmark___fire_strike_ultra_radeon_hd_5970_425_marks Thanks

Yes it works now and I also realised I was trying to put up a CPU score for GPUPI and I've rectified that now too. On another note what format does the verification URL have to be in? Ive Tried "https://www.3dmark.com/fs/15469026 and http://www.3dmark.com/fs/15469026 and just www.3dmark.com/fs/15469026 but it's not recognised as a link by the competition engine...

2018 Division IV Round 2 I just tried to submit scores for GPUPI for CPU, HWBOT x265 and CINEBENCH and for the the GPUPI I get an error: " Invalid data file: Unable to decrypt the datafile" and for the other two stages I get this error: "Only use processors from the sub family. - your submission is incomplete" Also when submitting a score the competition pop up only offers to add to Stages 1 and 2 (Fire Strike and Vantage) YD180XBCM88AE GPUPI 3.3.2 for CPU_1B_02m-53.228s at 4131-1780 & 1125-1550 R9 390X.hwbot

I had Road to Pro points from my Div II score but my Div IV points are higher and I prefer Division IV anyway so I selected Division IV expecting half of the Div IV points to show up but instead I get 0... Oh Well.

alright, I've gone back and run the two versions back to back and I see a 1.21% reduction in time for 3.3.2 versus the current generally approved version 3.2 for hwbot submissions.

I ran 3.3 a couple of times today and I'm not seeing any real change is scores with Ryzen 7 1800X; I didn't improve my previous time at the same clocks. it took a 0.58% clock speed boost to see a 1.9% reduction in time. Only one data point for me but not seeing the massive improvement mentioned, at least on CPU. Perhaps GPU is where the improvements are.

Trying to submit GPUPI_1B scores and I'm getting the following error: "You are not using a compatible version of GPUPI - 1B: 2.3. You can download the latest version here: https://www.overclockers.at/news/gpupi-international-support-thread" and yet I'm using v 2.3.4.

Windows 7 Ultimate, Ryzen 7 1800X / ROG Crosshair VI Hero. Is it something to do with the non-official support for that hardware on Windows 7? I've got zeffy's patch (https://github.com/zeffy/wufuc) to allow the updates to keep coming enabled...

When starting the HWBOT Unigine Heaven Benchmark Application a message appears saying "This is not the official HWBOT version. Do you want to download the official version?" with buttons for Yes and No. Clicking either of the buttons just dismisses the message box and the wrapper works as expected...

edit: (couldn't actually edit the above post...) I guess the one you're after is beta. R7SD820A and later has ACC code support for 45nm dual and tri core Phenom II's....

Is that a beta bios? pretty sure the 790FXB-M2RS and the 790FXB-M2RSH have exactly the same BIOS and I'm pretty sure I have all the release BIOS for the -M2RSH and R7SD224A is not among them.

Ryzen 7 1800X / Crosshair VI Hero.

Thanks for the tip. I wonder if anyone has time to care for this variation is setting up this zero point benchmark. lol. Or if anyone has time to care...

Is there an exception to the rule that says you can't change the benchmark settings for #DMark 99 Max??

Anybody else seem this where in Windows 7 3DMark 99 Max always runs locked to v-sync even when the drivers, d3doverrider etc are set to v-sync off? Probably not; it's not like it gets point or anything.

Thanks!

Can I submit a CrossfireX result made with a Radeon HD 3870 GDDR4 (primary card) and a Radeon HD 3870 X2 (Secondary Card - GDDR3) and if so what category would it go in?

cbjaust`s HWBOT x265 Benchmark - 1080p score: 10.36 fps with a Core i7 4600U Please change the gpu type to " Mobile HD Graphics 4400 (Haswell GT2)" because I didn't know what it actually was at the time and also OCD Cheers

another +1 vote for starting from scratch with the new XTU version. Be interesting to see how any given user's new score versus their old scores... wonder if any actual cheaters (if there are any) will rebench and resubmit with the new approved version.

these two have also been recognised by the database as 2xClawhammer Athlon 64 3500+ intead of 1x: cbjaust`s Geekbench3 - Multi Core score: 1112 points with a Athlon 64 3500+ (Clawhammer) cbjaust`s wPrime - 1024m score: 33min 18sec 670ms with a Athlon 64 3500+ (Clawhammer)

boom!

I've had similar trouble but with s939 Opteron 170 not being recognised as a computation target by GPUPI even with the right SDK installed.

only your best score will count

None of those benchmarks are eligible for points they'll still get you a rank and earn cups and medals if in top 5 though.