cbjaust

Well that's not how it's actually working at present. I guess it will be fixed before the end. ?

For the Reference Frequency Stage it seems to be based on the Socket the CPU is intended for. Here unityofsaints' score using an AM3 Phenom II X4 970 on the C4E (an AM3 board): http://hwbot.org/submission/4004746_unityofsaints_reference_frequency_crosshair_iv_extreme_405.85_mhz is apparently being trumped by macsbeach98's score using an AM3 Sempron 145 on the AM2+ 790FXB-M2RSH: http://hwbot.org/submission/3974543_macsbeach98_reference_frequency_lanparty_dk_790fxb_m2rsh_429.97_mhz I think the Reference Frequency stage should be based on the Socket of the Mainboard rather than the CPU being used as seems to be the case. For CPU benchmarks it should be as it is - i.e. based on the CPU socket.

yeah XTU should totally go. How can it be global when it's specific to Intel? Should you not wait until _mat_ gets GPUPI 4.0 out the door before abandoning GPUPI 3.2 and below?

Run the render test and it will show the boost clocks.

Would getting rid of the XTU results that are about 48% of all results in the database help with reducing the server load?

Please recalc Geekbench3 Single and Multi for Ryzen 3 2200G; Matsglobetrotter is clogging up the rankings Single Core: http://hwbot.org/benchmark/geekbench3_-_single_core/rankings?hardwareTypeId=processor_5686&cores=4#start=0#interval=20 Multi Core: http://hwbot.org/benchmark/geekbench3_-_multi_core/rankings?hardwareTypeId=processor_5686&cores=4#start=0#interval=20

I think that has something to do with the scoring on a per core basis... did you use the submit score button from the competition page or the regular submit score button? I have found the same problem when using the regular button for certain competion scores... (can't remember which exactly) Should work: Doesn't work for some comp benches:

Better ask Bilko I guess... Thanks Gearge.

I uploaded a Country Cup 2018 - HWBOT x265 Benchmark - 4k score using Socket AM4 / Ryzen 3 2200G but it does not show in the team contribution ranking. Bilko had an AM4 / Ryzen 7 2700X score but he has since uploaded an X399 / 2920X score, should his higher score negate his earlier (lower) score from the other socket? Team contribution Ranking: http://hwbot.org/search/submissions/permalink?ids=3989335,3979946,3977419,3978694 My 2200G score: http://hwbot.org/submission/3989627_cbjaust_hwbot_x265_benchmark___4k_ryzen_3_2200g_4.717_fps/ Bilko's 2700X score: http://hwbot.org/submission/3987847_bilko_hwbot_x265_benchmark___4k_ryzen_7_2700x_10.774_fps Bilko's 2920X score: http://hwbot.org/submission/3989335_bilko_hwbot_x265_benchmark___4k_ryzen_threadripper_2920x_16.328_fps

Very nice!

thanks heaps for taking the time. ?

As for the Team Points being the sum of points for the current year, won't that lead to gaming the system by rebenching all of your hardware that gets the best scores every year plus what ever new hardware benched that gets a good score?

Please change Power Supple brand from Antec to Seasonic and remove "TruePower Quattro" from the Series field. Sorry for the hassle, I'd fix it myself but the comp has ended so I can no longer edit the entry. http://hwbot.org/submission/3916407_cbjaust_3dmark_99_max_geforce2_mx_12340_marks Thanks in advance.

The so called "Team" rankings in the proposed revision is pretty much pointless if it is going to rely on the same ranking scheme. As it is now there is incentive to bench anything and everything since points are awarded separately best team scores. New Rev. will obliterate that incentive and make the very concept of Teams worthless. VOTE NO

also the non-conformant screenshot and the use of Windows 10...

Fair enough, but why couldn't you get your screenshot to match your CPU-Z validation?

Good one, only a few points off the ambient record!

Thanks. Re-benched.

Cheers. It was a lucky strike from a scumtree haul (Lian-Li PC-71, Geil DDR 1GB, San Diego 4000+, more DDR and a couple of 775 office boxes for AUD$30!)

your dual core version http://hwbot.org/submission/3953898_optytrooper_cinebench___r11.5_phenom_ii_x2_b59_2.78_points/ has the same problem.

it's in the thread here

the dual core optimiser is a driver for windows, and nothing to do with the chipset.

would the AMD Dual Core Optimizer be required? AMD utilities page

apparently Opty has a habit of reporting subs at the drop of a hat and yet posts up this debacle. ?

Have an even number of stages between AMD/Intel and AMD/nVidia