Monstru

lab501 discusion topic: http://lab501.ro/forum/showthread.php?t=682

Waaaaahhhaaa =))

Sorry man, but I have checjed the real frequency with some special tools, and I also checked it with WPrime, and the multi drop is real. And I am using the 64bit CPU-Z for x64 Anyway, I am glad to hear that the new bios improves the booting issue, I will give it a try for sure. I am sorry, I didn't see where you have explained this problem. It needs a special ratio between the two, or what is the problem exactly?

Nice work Pieter. Weird stuff the vcore issue though, I used F4E a lot and I could run 1.63v on LN2 without any problems. The werid problem I had with UD6 is the multi dropping when I adjust BKCL in Windows. Also, if OC fails in Windows under LN2, I have to reset the BIOS in order to boot (a problem that I also have with GD80, but not with Maximus III). Other then that, UD6 does indeed perform very well. From the 3 (UD6, GD80 and Maximus III), under LN2, the GD 80 impressed me the most untill now. It just feels right

Oh boy this is so funny =))

Ok, thank you very much for the info, it is very good that we do not use forum scanning anymore. Now all that we need is the support for vBulletin 3.8.3 for updating the rankings on the first post from the threads. I still get this error.

Ticket ID: 453 Priority: High Please help me figur ethis out:\r\n\r\n1. If the bot scans the forum I get this error:\r\n\r\n[info] hwbot #3684 is instructed harvest the forum for new results, worker: TP-Processor1707\r\n[info] Loaded 0 results from 0 forumposts from previous scans.\r\n[warn] Error, failed to contact external host: http://lab501.ro/forumshowthread.php?t=128&page=1\r\n[info] Done harvesting the forum for results.\r\n\r\n\r\n2. If the bot tries to update the ranking, I get this error:\r\n\r\n[warn] Failed to edit first page: The response did not contain the required authentication cookie(s), it should contain bbsessionhash, bbpassword, bbuserid but none were received. Either the supplied password or login is incorrect, or your forum software is not supported.\r\n[warn] stacktrace:\r\n[warn] org.hwbot.util.WebPageImpl.login() line 377\r\n[warn] org.hwbot.persistence.Forum.login() line 121\r\n[warn] org.hwbot.service.BotServiceImplV2.updateFirstPost() line 633\r\n[warn] org.hwbot.service.BotServiceImplV2.updateForumRanking() line 397\r\n[warn] org.hwbot.facade.BotFacadeImpl.updateForumByBot() line 507

Pricelless

:D:D It's this type of basic stuff that experts allways forget Like putting the RAM in the "other" slots in X58 boards

Young hipro at it again

If old George will ever cheat, I will cut my balls and feed them to my dog

I am not saying anything about this user. But regarding the Checksum checker by TPU, untill everything is official, I would not base any conclusion on it. There are some checksums that are not ok from some serious people, so I think wizzard has to look into that validator some more.

WTF...I write "checked" when I check a score that is OK, after someone reports it. Your score is perfectly ok, but it seems that I chose "incorrect sumbission" by mistake. My bad, score is back up If there are any other scores like this, please give me the link and I will fix them.

Unfortunately I am seeing more and more problems with CPU-Z lately, and by no means any kind attitude from them towards solving them.

CPU-Z gets more shabby with every new version it seems. Contact the guys from CPU-Z, but I don't know if they will be kind enough to solve your problem

Ok, I wanted to say something about this a while ago. About that crazy Monstru person that checks every top 20 score... I am not watching you, I didn't go crazy, I am not on a checking spree. But HWB's policy is that every TOP20 score should be moderated by a mod, so that is what I have done

It's a concept, like every concept. With it's goods, it's wrongs and so on. It's not the most important thing for overclockers and it's not going to be the last competition. It's a manufacturer's competition, it may have a great succes, it may fail, we'll live and see how it's developing. If the second year is with qualifiers, that is a good thing and everybody is looking forward to that I guess. Untill then I am really curious to see some of the titan's clashing, after the names I have seen on the first page. BWHAHAHA this will be nice to see!!!

Interesting ideea, I am curious to see how things will move on.

They have definately used the same OS, same tweaks, and maybe same rig without CPU and RAM. Unfortunately the HWBot rules only prevent users from using the same CPU for 2D benchmarks, so not much we can do by the book...Even if they have benched together, on the same platform, right now the rules only say about the CPU, nothing else. Probablly they used the same HDD, with the same tweaked OS and such.

Yah...well god forbidd you ever need some help, give them an email or post on their forums. Thei don't even have the politeness to write down a simple answer.

I'd rather find an official alternative for CPU-Z for CPU's, rather then using it also for GFX display. CPU-Z support sucks BIG time lately

Ok, usefull info

How can I see there is a duplicate in the DB when I am editing the score? I've edited tens of scores without this problem...

Hey guys, from 22th to the 24th of May 2009, in Romania, we will organize the first Extreme Romanian Overclocking Party, where all extreme romanian overclockers will be present. We will have an overclocking bootcamp, with 3 days of benching, eating, drinking and sleeping together, in rural conditions. Basically, we are 10-15 nice gentlemen like myslef () gathering together in a small rural house, with no bath, and an outside wooden toilet, with lots of pork and beer, but most important, with TONS of hardware and LN2. We might or we might not do some serious HWB damage, but I wanted to inform you guys ao you know what's going on on our side. The equipment list looks like this: CPU's: 2 x Intel i7 965 (C0) 3 x Intel i7 920 (C0) 2 x Intel i7 920 (D0) 3 x Intel E8600 Intel Q8400 Intel 631 AMD Phenom II 955 and some socket A CPU's MB's: 2 x Asus Rampage II Extreme Asus Rampage II Gene Asus P6T Deluxe Biostar T-Power X58 DFI UT X58 T3eH8 EVGA Classified Gigabyte X58 Extreme Gigabyte X58 UD5 Gigabyte X58 UD4 2 x Asus Rampage Extreme 2 x Biostar T-Power i45 Gigabyte EP45-UD3 Asus M4A79T Deluxe Asrock M3A790GXH/128M GFX's: 4 x GTX 295 3 x GTX 285 3 x GTX 280 3 x GTX 260 2 x 9800GX2 3 x HD4770 10 x 4890 3 x 4870 RAM: 3x1GB Corsair DDR3-1600 C8 (Elpida) 2x2GB Corsair DDR3-1600 C9 (D9) 2x1GB TEAM DDR2-1066 C5 (D9GKX) 3x1GB Kingston T1 DDR3-2000 C8 (Elpida Hiper) 2x1GB Kingston T1 DDR3-2000 C9 (D9GTS) 2x1GB Kingston DDR3-2000 C9 (D9GTR) 3x2GB AData DDR3 1600 (Elpida) PSU: Antec Signature 850W 2x CoolerMaster RPP 1250W Coolermaster UCP 1100W OCZ EliteXtream 1000W 2x Seventeam 1200W Ultra X3 1600W Cooling: 2 x Kingpin Tek 9 5.0 Kingpin Tek 9 4.0 Kingpin F1EE 2 x Duniek CPU semi-solids 2 x Ryba CPU semi-solids CrazyPC Solid Copper CPU pot 2 x Duniek semi-solid GPU Pots 1 x Ryba semi-solid GPU pot 3 x CrazyPC Solid GPU Pots countless NB pots Plus lots of other stuff I forgot about...

It takes a while for HWB to update the rankings.