-
Posts
1526 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
37
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by TASOS
-
-
4930K
3325A911
How is your IMC like ?
Have you tested with PSC or BBSE ?
-
i7 4930K(Retail) @ 4.7GHz cinebench @ 1.29 volt air-cooling
Batch: 3325A911
http://hwbot.org/submission/2427875_tasos_cinebench_r11.5_core_i7_4930k_14.32_points
//
update here
Upsolute max on air-cooling (temp related)
4.82Ghz cinebench @ 1.36 volt
http://hwbot.org/submission/2428248_tasos_cinebench_r11.5_core_i7_4930k_14.64_points
.
-
i7 4930K(Retail) @ 4.7GHz cinebench @ 1.29 volt air-cooling
Batch: 3325A911
http://hwbot.org/submission/2427875_tasos_cinebench_r11.5_core_i7_4930k_14.32_points
-
I don't think we can bring back the exact search functionality like before, but perhaps something where one search parameter is required and benchmark is one of the options.
For example ?
Search for all bench with 3770k , is ok ?
-
The thing is , that hwbot is not what it used to be.
Anybody remember the days with RB and bots in every forum ?
Anyway ...
Long story , short.
Every year passing-by (so far) , with all these new ideas and categories and promotions ... with pro styles , superpro styles and super duper pro styles ... you are loosing the amateurs , the everyday people , the ones that have o/c as a hobby and loving it.
If it's the big boys that you want here ...
Those 20-30 working for companies and an other 20-30 that are friends of the first group and get the leftovers of hardware ... then let it be that way.
But just tell so.
So , everybody else that doesnt agree with that idea , can look up for an other place-space ... where they wont bother you and perhaps competition should be more pure !!!
YES ... it's good to see extreme scores.
Scores that need Skills to achieve.
BUT ... what's the point of all that , when you know , that it takes extreme binning of everything (in Laaarge quantities ... and for free) to get there.
The ordinary people , that can afford to buy one board , one cpu , one pair of mem , one vga ... even assuming that they have the skills ... they simply dont stand a chance , to even come close to a top score.
SO ...
It has to be crystal clear ... where everybody stands and then go by the book.
Companies , sponsored , semi sponsored , and best buddies sponsored ... should be in one big yard.
Rest of the world in an other one , their own.
Recognition for achievements ... for ALL people.
p.s.
Plz excuse my English.
-
GALAXY
Z87-HOF (Hall Of Fame)
http://www.anandtech.com/show/7043/computex-2013-galaxy-expanding-into-motherboards-psus-ssds
It has very interesting features.
Anybody knows if this board is going into production ?
Should we add it to the list ?
-
Nice score , and looks like a quite good cpu also.
-
@Tasos: what is the name of the Evga board?
Now we have 3 motherboards.
http://www.evga.com/articles/00751/#Home
EVGA Z87 Classified
EVGA Z87 FTW
EVGA Z87 Stinger
-
- INTEL
- Intel DZ87KLT-75K
http://www.intel.com/support/motherboards/desktop/dz87klt-75k/sb/CS-034223.htm?wapkw=dz87klt-75k
http://www.techpowerup.com/184663/intel-desktop-board-dz87klt-75k-pictured.html
Screenshot of Intel DZ87KLT-75K
//
P.S
EVGA board , not yet on 1st post ?
-
In the "Discuss submissions" subforum , the score links dont work.
When you click to see the result , the path is not valid.
Example
http://forum.hwbot.org/showthread.php?t=76406
path of submission
http://forum.hwbot.org/submission/2382788_vivi_superpi___32m_core_i7_3770k_4min_58sec_641ms
results to
Not FoundThe requested URL /submission/2382788_vivi_superpi___32m_core_i7_3770k_4min_58sec_641ms was not found on this server.
Apache/2.2.22 (Ubuntu) Server at forum.hwbot.org Port 80
EDIT
It has been reported before , but still no fix.
-
Just me??
Same here.
It's a general issue.
-
-
- INTEL
- Intel DZ87KLT-75K
http://www.intel.com/support/motherboards/desktop/dz87klt-75k/sb/CS-034223.htm?wapkw=dz87klt-75k
These not planned for production ?
- Intel DZ87KLT-70K - ?
- Intel DZ87CA-55K - ?
- Intel DZ87CO-50K - ?
-
Very Interesting !!!
Nice move.
-
I do like the idea of this stage but I don't think it has a place in a major competition like this. Perhaps on its own as a non-point stage for prizes or something but in its current form it is a failure. Only 7 teams actually put up scores in the stage and some teams not even for both substages, that is less than 10% participation rate. By including this stage, it effectively eliminates from the competition any team that isn't able to organize, can't afford, or isn't geographically situated to put on an event for the stage.
Again, I respect the idea of the stage and what was trying to be accomplished by it, but to eliminate 90% of the teams based on something that doesn't have to do with overclocking skill/hardware/ability doesn't seem the greatest idea. Just my two cents, on this stage now that its over.
+1
-
Thank you both !!!
-
I need a quick fix for this submission please.
Move to correct category ... and participate to team cup.
http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2377615_
Thanks !!!
-
For a newcomer ... and first bench ever ... it's a nice score.
Also mind that it's single channel mem , and completely untweaked !!!
-
Your first submission to HWBOT !!!
Congrats.
//
P.S.
Check out the rules , for a proper screenshot.
-
I'm gonna be a dick and complain about a feature!
When I click "open CPU-Z...." I get 4 instances and then, when I either open OR MAXIMISE GPU-Z, I get a 5th instance of CPU-Z....whilst pushing GPU-Z 80% off-screen (right hand side)
We need two CPU-Z instances for verification..... please can that be the number that are opened?
Also, if we click "run again" .....can there be a script to automatically close CPU-Z and GPU-Z? (ok...this is probably not needed once the instance count is sorted, we can close three windows )
Thanks
I have the same problem , and i also dont use a skinned version.
-
For me it was clear from the start.
In any case i (or my team members) had any doubt , i asked or doublecheck release dates and related parameters.
Below in red highlighted , is the key factor of this competition.
The main theme of the Team Cup 2013 revolves around high-end performance since the beginning of this millennium. We took the most high-end components available at every second year, starting from 2000, and build a competition around it featuring the benchmarks SuperPI 1M, 3DMark03 and 3DMark Vantage.That's my opinion ... that's where i stand.
-
It's never too late to correct a mistake !!!
... and it's more fair for the people that used the proper hardware.
-
Thanks for your effort and time.
Very useful review and info on all those products.
-
I boot with 1.80 volt bios at 3Ghz mem and tried up to 1.87 in windows , but there is no change at all in max mem freq. after 1.85 volt
Debug "00" R4F + 4930K
in General hardware discussion
Posted
I had the same problem with my RIVE and 4930k.
You need a Sandy Bridge-E cpu , so that you can flash to the latest bios (that supports Ivy Bridge-E).
If your board has an early bios (ROM type) you need to do the conversion to CAP first (with bios 2105)