Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

TASOS

Members
  • Posts

    1548
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    42

Everything posted by TASOS

  1. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=569900 OLD version of superpi without decimal digits This score should be validated as 12.99
  2. 1)This result is from an ATI 9000 PRO It shows clearly in this photo http://images.people.overclockers.ru/71871.jpg It also has a wrong futuremark link. The correct one is below http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8966756 2)This score is correct http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=511147 But to be valid,please add the following Forum post http://www.overclocking-masters.com/forum/hwbot-Classement-Super-PI-1M,p51914.htm#p51914 Screnshot http://112233445566.free.fr/PM740/22.281.jpg Edit please Thanks
  3. Some more links for editing.... 1)http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559983 Verified by a moderator ....by mistake i believe. The score belongs to a P4 3.0 'E' 2)http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559973 This screenshot can't verify the result. (just a clockgen picture) ?? It could be any kind of cpu.
  4. The result below...i believe,belongs to the Celeron 478s 335 section. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=570425 This one,also...(Family 15 Model 3 Stepping 3) 256kb cache...that's a prescott core...so its a Celeron 335 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=574804 Also,this one is NOT a mobile XP2500+ ...it's a regular Barton XP2500+ http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=506961
×
×
  • Create New...