Antinomy

Yep. The bears freak me out

Hey, how the hell these bears have my Birth Day written on the board? Now I'm afraid of them. Their powers might be more than I expected.

Now I know her secret. It's all about bears well... anywhere? Top resolution is a little less than mine (I like 16:10).CherV, why only 120Hz?

Very nice CherV. Looks like you've found an utility that does the same I had for backup. Though I've caught only TW, not all PCMark windows.

I see the same situation as with wPrime. If your CPU is strange enough that scales best being loaded with a bunch of threads - why not? The algorithm doesn't change. Should be even more fun on dual socket boards

Chev, insane score! Can you confirm that Gluvo's audio tweak is not about replacing the default codec file?

Gamer, the answer is epic! LMAO

xXSebaSXx, did you see the video that Tweak-venetica provided? I was talking about his suggestion. That doing so we get pixel performance crippled compared to the sweet point. I've got a shift from 9xx to 1400 on 8800GTS 512. so I do know how to do this.

LOD give about nothing for Physics and 3D. But it will cripple 3D pixel shader performance. Are you aware of this? Nice video except the noisy music and only a few tweaks shown. Better make several parts with 2-3 subtests in each one.

Yep, exactly. Thermalright cooler and about +4-6 Celcius. It was a cool day. I think water cooling will do better.

I did. They do add much performance but are clearly restricted by the rules. I was testing this back in the days when rules weren't that clear about modifying the files. pro, do I understand correctly that in your TW you have only the windows titles flying around? Is such stuff allowed?

I hope I won't get hurt because of this

Impressive! Proving your Master degree in wPrime.

Can't get the file copy method working. I can either start to copy it before running PCMark - that way PCMark halts and can't run till the copy ends. Or I can run it right after running PCMark - that way 50% is that the bench halts like described above. And then I get over 250MB/s. Or copy runs during test and I get about 32MB/s The less files I take the more frequently the copy ends before the test runs (halting it). Now where's that IOmeter?

Happy Birthday, Karl! Wish you to keep pushing hardware and stay one of the most active guys at HWBot

Nice score! But you should move these to 2core category since you use only one CPU: http://hwbot.org/submission/2269362_ http://hwbot.org/submission/2269363_ http://hwbot.org/submission/2269364_ http://hwbot.org/submission/2269365_ http://hwbot.org/submission/2269366_ http://hwbot.org/submission/2269367_ Good start. But this is only kid-playing before the monster arrives :-D

Thank you Frank! I'm on my way for your scores

Lucky bastard!

Excellent, Frank! You still have some homework to do.

Yep, got same error in the morning about 12 hours ago. Using Firefox.

Well, there's a public mail left: cpuz_andyouknowwhathere_cpuid.com

Totally agree with Mr.Scott - nice score and there's space for improvement! Congratulations Frank!

Ticket ID: 1474 Priority: Medium 1. Delete socket 478 from AMD section\r\n2. Delete socket 754 from Intel section\r\n3. Move this board http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/cur_dls/ from TCP section to socket 370 (it\'s a dual socket 370 board), rename it\'s chipset - hwbot.org/hardware/chipset/le_3.0/ manufacturer from Unknown to \"ServerWorks\" and name from \"LE 3.0\" to \"ServerSet III LE\". And fix the board\'s page - the TCP mobile list shows that there are 14 submissions with this board while the board\'s page shows none.

dammit I've failed this one. When you know all CPUs that are installed in the computers at work. And their steppings. And you definitely have checked their overclocking potential months ago. When you're angry that there aren't any nasty D9 chips in these computers as well.

I remember when Sam was surprisingly one of the youngest overclockers