-
Posts
1960 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
10
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by Sweet
-
Sweet - Radeon HD 5870 @ 947/1345MHz - 87143 marks 3DMark2001 SE
Sweet replied to Leeghoofd's topic in Result Discussions
You think ?, perhaps.... i'll try with another driver tonight With Win 7 Nature (780 +/-) is better but the others subtest are worse Mike, do you think are the drivers, too? -
The official GIGABYTE Year of the Snake Prize Draw thread.
Sweet replied to Massman's topic in HWBOT Competitions
Congratz to the winners I cant forget to use CPU-Z OC And I cant forget my daughter's dog, he has a piece of my finger &%=/&%$#! -
Sweet - Radeon HD 5870 @ 947/1345MHz - 87143 marks 3DMark2001 SE
Sweet replied to Leeghoofd's topic in Result Discussions
No by now, This 5870 is Sapphire Vapor-x rev 2 , and only with hardmod can climb over 940 mhz. Maybe in the next days , if I have time, I do and I try -
Moose83 - Core i7 3770K @ 5740MHz - 61846 marks PCMark 2005
Sweet replied to dhenzjhen's topic in Result Discussions
Hey there Moose, my friend, please dlete this score, The crew knows that "the memory latency is a known bug, caused by setting particular memory timings too tight". So please dlete this bugged score and re-run. Regards Moose -
Hey there guys, with the new version, i cant upload new submission. "Invalid data file: Unable to parse the datafile" This is my problem or datafile problem ?
-
OverExtreme - Core i5 2500K @ 5362MHz - 43446 marks PCMark 2005
Sweet replied to Morteza.p's topic in Result Discussions
Nice score of course, but you must show storage in picture, please upload a picture of your storage in the submission, Rules: Otherwise, we must block this submission, Thanks so much -
Teemto - Radeon HD 6970 @ 1000/1425MHz - 135423 marks 3DMark03
Sweet replied to a topic in Result Discussions
Blocked -
Gen This 2.23 ver run like a charm, all ok in Win 7 x64, only somthing strange in XP x86, anyway i click on Yes and run properly, i dont know why happen with Xp x86 (Tiny eXperience) Buen trabajo mi amigo !! Good job my friend !!
-
mr.frizz - Radeon X600 SE (RV370) @ 398/250MHz - 525 marks 3DMark06
Sweet replied to Sweet's topic in Result Discussions
Ok, thanks so much Regards -
Feliz Cumpleaños Massman !! Never is too late
-
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
Sweet replied to Sweet's topic in Benchmark software
samt.bsb I think only one submission are blocked, because no subtest in the screen , the rest are checked ok. Remember, next time, please add result .txt in the screen Regards my friend !! -
Christian Ney - Celeron M 540 @ 3360MHz - 13049 marks PCMark 2005
Sweet replied to aslanwas's topic in Result Discussions
No that is not legal of course (only in this case) Christian can upload again your old screen (original screen), by the way all submission of PCM'05, until today 16/1/2013 ( this date for me ) will be "checked ok". Only until today this bench will be ok without result.txt, after today will be blocked Edit: Sorry i write before by after, Sweet !!! pay atention !!! sigh and sigh....... I hope what I wrote before, in part respond to your complaint. Yep i hope this bro. like i write to Scotty i hope that in part, respond at your demand. All loves you, but I dont Regards my friends -
Christian Ney - Celeron M 540 @ 3360MHz - 13049 marks PCMark 2005
Sweet replied to aslanwas's topic in Result Discussions
Isnt the same , CN no phoshop for cheat, he only add information. Isn't the same like phoshoped gpu-z clocks, cpu-z mhz or improve the result in the benchmark (any benchmark), he only add information in the old screen, and he added that for this discussion. -
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
Sweet replied to Sweet's topic in Benchmark software
Please samt.bsb, show me the link -
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
Sweet replied to Sweet's topic in Benchmark software
Guys, As you can read in the rules of the PCM'05. since 01/01/2013 is mandatory the .txt file, this has been agreed with all in this thread, where everyone can give their opinion and show new ideas to make this benchmark is more equal for all. This benchmark will survive if we all aim to give you a sense, instead die if we continue degrading this. Probably soon ORBs are no longer available, it is possible for a discharge, is a very old benchmark, is for that reason that we demand. txt on screen. regards -
Hey guys, please stop with this right now. There is a large set of rules to follow and we are the ones who must apply equally to all Let the moderators do their job, and continue all of you with overclocking, again, please stop this now. Meanwhile everyone can read the rules of HWBot and see if have done something wrong. General Rules Rules of PcMark'05 Yep, I know PCM, has brought many problems, but we need to contribute, "all together", for improvements this situation. We are definitely trying to solve the problems that have degraded this benchmark. Regards
-
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
Sweet replied to Sweet's topic in Benchmark software
For those who ask, "where is the. txt file" ? Inside the OcMark'05 folder following this route: C - programs files - futuremark - PcMark'05 Make a shortcut in your desktop, if you want.