Massman

- OCXtreme - XtremeSystems - HWbox.gr

When I'm testing a new board or memory, I always like to check the low-clock PI32M threads to compare performance on a clock-per-clock basis. I know those on XS and OCX, but apart from that I have no idea. Please drop a link of any SPI-32M low-clock challenge thread in here

Impressive

Oh, I thought the new Cinebench was still under NDA?

You can post it here

Just the two big ones

From the thread title: "Need ... help ... background design". What we do to prevent cheating is indeed kept internally (for good reasons). Of course, if you have ideas on how to add more protection, please share. One part of using a new application is visual identification. I don't want it to be bling, but I definitly want it to be visually different from other applications you're running. A black background with a huge PI symbol is actually already enough ... no bling, but tight design.

Looking better! GT2 is a tad low, though, I think. Artifacting?

Program problem. I think it's because I'm using a Clarkdale CPU and the Thaiphoon doesn't recognise it. I'll unplug my system and throw on the xpower + 980X. Then we're benchrig-buddies ... (-sigh- I have serious mental issues)

Cool!

Currently working on a wrapper for Hexus Pifast to make the app less cheat-able. Won't take that long to code (I hope ), adding it to the HWBOT dbase will take a little longer. Just like with the Unigine Heaven wrapper, we're going to have a GUI to launch the benchmark. Now, unlike the heaven benchmark, pifast doesn't really have a fancy GUI or picture ... so we need something to match the benchmark! In contrary to my extremely l33t HWBOINT design skills, which causes emotional damage just by looking at it, my photoshop design skills are sub-par. That's why I'm more than happy if someone from the community can provide a nice design for the background of the Pifast GUI. Size: 600x400 (same like Unigine) Type: I prefer tight designs like this, this or this Oh, and any feedback regarding the Pifast wrapper (what should be in and what should be out) is also welcome

Moved from Lounge forum to public forum for more feedback.

No, but people will not be able to check the score that was discussed. Why delete the score to begin with ... more scores = more data = more accurate charts

Wow! Nice run!

Oh, also just noticed you forgot the CPU-Z mainboard tab.

Oh, sorry, my bad! Fixed it.

The range of -95°C to -105°C sounds a lot like the original coldbug. Either that or you have the shittiest Clarkdale on the planet . Anyway, with 1.55V Vaux and -80°C you should already be hitting upwards 1350, I think.

cb 95-100c? Did you do the Clarkdale CB/CBB mod?

What temperature/voltage are you running? My board had some issues with QPI >3.5G and high VGA clocks. Maybe increase the IGP multiplier? If the BCLK is the problem, you can work around it. CPU shouldn't be so important ... mainly QPI and raw IGPclk.

This is just a warm-up run, right?

Why single channel? Other than that ... Nice!

Added to competition

Cant seem to get Taiphoon to start up here :-/

The 'one' you are showing has a QPI of 500MHz more ... I need an explanation for your GT2. It's ~ 10% too high for the clocks you are running.

Hehe! I'm still testing the GMA HD. Seems like this board doesn't like high QPI for some reason. My runs with the H55M-UD2H will be a lot better, I hope.