Massman

The community benefits ... how? Overclockers are people People lie Ergo: Overclockers lie So, at best, you've proven that overclockers lie and unless I'm wrong I believe this was already a given fact.

You have 900+ points, #2 doesn't even have 200

I didn't say anything about underpants or claimed you have said anything untrue. Just to be clear, I also didn't say anything about driving under influence, using drugs, killing people, being racist or any other crime. All I'm saying is that posting personal conversations (PM, MSN, email) in public without the consent of the other party is not done.

Posting MSN logs in public really is not done ...

Revising caps is kind of difficult. It would suck damn hard if you pushed a few weeks for the title and then see it taken away because you're the 11th to reach it

Sum of hardware points of all submissions using X socket

S462 King = #1 S462 Guru = hit fixed points total S462 Junkie = have fixed submission total or have fixed cup/medal total?

The amount of points per socket type differ a lot, so 100 isn't applicable everywhere (not that it forms a problem ... we can just change this per socket type) LGA 775 name sum(result.hwpoints) jabski 2486.7 GraduS 1376.4 aspms* 1083.1 dRweEz 1049.8 RoccoESA 989.1 TaPaKaH 951.4 kim55 841.2 Moonman 814.0 tiborrr 717.7 jmax_oc 712.7 westyle 704.0 demiurg 621.8 boblemagnifique 613.4 mortisboy 583.6 Maduk 582.0 Deathscyth 557.0 Pt1t 548.0 hs 544.6 Sergey13 544.4 AndreyKV 513.1

Yeah, true ... the S939 ranking is rediculous. Just no way to compete. For the king, do we use the same large 'king'-icon as in the overclockers league and hardware masters ranking? Otherwise we could do it like this

It's perfectly doable! "S462 King" name - points tiborrr - 308.3 Barton - 209.9 Stone_age - 155.3 Turrican - 149.9 Berserker - 143.4 The III - 131.8 hs - 123.5 michaelnm - 108.2 Bwanasoft - 92.9 RIBEIROCROSS - 84.7 qwerty84 - 74.1 maxine - 56.3 Moonman - 52.6 cnzdrn - 49.0 giukey79 - 43.0 Mr.Scott - 42.4 Patrickclouds - 42.0 pxhx - 41.0 Jaan - 39.6 Klausr@HWUS.at - 38.4

Regarding the 'socket king'. Do you guys want this to be both 2D and 3D points? I would think 2D only ... but I just want to ask

Pretty sure this memory divider is very badly tuned for performance ...

Ah, ok. So the (important) achievements should be visible in the signature?

This one is for multi-socket submissions: http://hwbot.org/community/achievement/701_ Maybe extend this one with multiple levels?

Hm ... maybe we could get the HW junkie/guru back as an achievement depending on other achievements. So, if you get 5/10 in all points/medal series you're a 'junkie' or so ...

You mean the names? The #(cups/medals) is still in the achievements.

? What do you mean exactly with 'previous version'?

Hey guys, As you might've seen, we've updated the achievements a few weeks ago. The goal is to add a lot more so you have more things to do than just grab points for the team. Since inspiration sometimes gets a bit lost and as this ultimately is for your pleasure, I'm wondering if you guys have suggestions for cool and nifty achievements. Just reply in the thread if something comes to mind. Technically, anything HWBOT related should be possible (mem, mobo, scores, dates, etc etc).

Another important note for all those who want to get the most out of their system

Nah. It's something a lot more stupid. When setting unganged mode, you basically make the mem config 2x 64bit, so you need to have both DCT's configured. So, if you set unganged mode and want performance, you need to set the DRAM mode to 'both' and manually fix both DCT timings. If you don't, one DCT is set to SPD timings, I think. Fixed my issues, so I asked MSI to implent a bios option that allows end users to set both by only typing in the timings manually once. a 'linked' option.

Last night I've attempted to open up the 200/266/333 memory dividers for Thuban using the 790FX-GD70. The modifications should've gone perfectly, being that the options are added as well as the registry settings for them (IIRC). Only problem is that selecting the bios option gives me the 1:2 divider and not the lower ones ... as if there's a limitation set to the lowest possible divider is 1:2. The bios doesn't crash when saving the option, though, so I'm reluctant to say there's such limitation and maybe just something I've missed. As you can see, three times 1:1 (added just one string to make it easy for myself) for 200/266/333 registry setting. I also removed th 1:2 just because I was able to.

For these clocks, you should be a tad higher, I think. Have you set the DRAM to 'fastest' instead of 'normal'? It helped me quite a bit.

Nice! TCCD inherently better than BH5? Will 330MHz CL2,5 blow away any CL2?

A solid 1000 points

Ok, figured out what's going wrong. Instead of 820-ish, I now get 950-ish with same timings/clocks!