Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Massman

Members
  • Posts

    20467
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    16

Everything posted by Massman

  1. The switch was correct (data of score shouldn't be used for analysis), but there's a problem with what you get to see when opening that link. Something that needs to be fixed at our side.
  2. Doh! I somehow got the idea that these chips did't exist. Can you link me up with cpu-z links for the data, I'll restore them asap.
  3. Ah, I think I know. The moderatool tools consist of a set of tools to indicate how the engine can use the score. For instance: - Can be used for ranking, data, ... - Can only be used for data, not ranking, not points - Can not be used for data, not for ranking, not for points The last option is coded as "delete", because the score can't be used for statistical data. The score isn't deleted from the database (moderators can still see the score), but it's no longer visible for any member. I'll ask if it's possible to allow the owner of the result to see the score.
  4. "An hwbot crew member, NeoForce, has blocked one of your submitted scores. It has been marked as 'impossible score at given settings, possible bug or other'." Doesn't say delete?
  5. No, we've had the PNG bug before and the "open screenshot wants to download"-bug is reported to RB.
  6. Just FYI: all scores have been blocked and hardware categories have been removed.
  7. The reason of blocking was not the subtest scores, but the score which is too high for the given frequencies apparently.
  8. View more gives the right results, but incorrect points (looks to be 0,1-0,2p off)
  9. Gulftown might be an issue. Can you retest the exact same configuration (mobo/mem/os) with a Bloomfield?
  10. The hwbot engine 'knows' what hardware can be unlocked and which can't. If the hardware is not in the list, it will always be placed in the same category. In other words, the engine doesn't allow you to use an i7 in any category but the 4xCPU one.
  11. We considered it, but didn't do it because the Overclockers League should mainly be about the global points. It should represent skill over money, extreme oc over air oc and so on. Afaik, the balance between hardware cap and top20 was more tight in rev2.
  12. Check on the left of the page We don't have ads ... certainly no clickables. Frontpage usability will improve over the next few weeks. It takes some time to get our head around the new lay-out as well ...
  13. Who deleted what score exactly?
  14. Hm, okay ... then we need to figure out why the others are scoring so low :-/
  15. Added to backlog, RB will answer this after he checks if it's possible.
  16. Latency result looks weird: 3x lower than what other users are reporting. Is this a bug in the program or did you use a tweak or OS difference?
  17. Thanks for reporting! Either some results used to be delete or there's another issue. You can see that certain results don't get points, click on them and check the nickname in the result_id ... there's nothing indicated.
  18. In the next couple of days, I'll extend the competition and add clarkdale/westmere stages ... we're going untill the world record is broken!
  19. Want to add it, but admin page gives me errors when trying to see the competition.
×
×
  • Create New...