Everything posted by Rauf
-
Giant 3D elephant in the room no one wants to talk about...(why is it always me bringing this stuff to light?)
Same as for the scores with superposition release candidate version there are some unbeatable hw points because they were done when rules did not explicitly say beta or rc versions were not allowed. Fyi, I don't agree with this line of thinking, but removing all old scores is also a bit drastic. And checks can only be done for 3dmark anyway, not superposition so not sure how much we gain by this. For sure there will be huge moderation work still because I guess most users won't read the rules that carefully.
- OGS - GeForce RTX 3090 Ti @ 2805/1412MHz - 529169 marks 3DMark03
-
Giant 3D elephant in the room no one wants to talk about...(why is it always me bringing this stuff to light?)
Some people seem to not understand what is going on... Many cards in the 40XX-generation can produce bugged rendering if overclocked too high. This affects all 3D-rendering in all benchmarks, all games etc. It's an issue for benchmarking because users don't play fair and submit bugged results knowingly. It's not limited to 3DMarks, same thing happens in Superposition, CatZilla etc. But UL are the ones trying to come up with a solution. This issue is not exclusive for nvidia either, we saw many wrong scores with AMD 6900-cards also. But it was not as wide spread as this issue. There are three options: 1. continue like we always have but have a ton of moderation work on hwbot and UL etc to manually check for bugged scores. Some will definitely slip through anyway. 2. give up benching this generation and hope next one in 2 years don't bug as easily. 3. Try to fix the problem because thanks to ECC option we have a way that might work and even the playing field...
-
Giant 3D elephant in the room no one wants to talk about...(why is it always me bringing this stuff to light?)
Well, already talked to Pasi about it a bunch because 3dmark hall of fame is full of bugged runs. But it's a nightmare to moderate. Especially on cold as there is some weird cold efficiency bug that hurt efficiency when you run colder also. Especially superposition seems sensitive to cold efficiency... But anyone benching on Hwbot should be able to tell if their score is bugged or not. As you say, you don't get a huge bump in score from doing nothing or just slightly higher clocks. But how do you reach everyone and get everyone to follow the rules?
- OGS - GeForce RTX 4090 @ 3705/1510MHz - 31932 marks 3DMark - Port Royal
- LiQuid_cOOled - GeForce RTX 4090 @ 3180/1500MHz - 50927 marks 3DMark - Fire Strike Extreme
- LiQuid_cOOled - GeForce RTX 4090 - 50927 marks 3DMark - Fire Strike Extreme
- Takukou - GeForce RTX 4090 @ 3480/1512.7MHz - 23858 marks 3DMark - Time Spy Extreme
- Rauf - GeForce RTX 4090 @ 3585/1500MHz - 53301 marks 3DMark - Fire Strike Extreme
- shar00750 - GeForce GTX 980 Ti @ 1650/2000MHz - 291660 marks 3DMark2001 SE
- Splave - Ryzen 9 7950X @ 6750MHz - 20143 cb Cinebench - R20
- sergmann - GeForce GTX 980 Ti @ 1537/2000MHz - 292992 marks 3DMark2001 SE
- OGS - GeForce RTX 4090 @ 3345/1512MHz - 30246 marks 3DMark - Port Royal
- noizemaker - Core i9 13900K (8P) @ 8242.1MHz - 3min 6sec 443ms SuperPi - 32M
-
Rauf - GeForce GTX 980 Ti @ 1950/2150MHz - 300023 marks 3DMark2001 SE
Thanks all! This is another Matrix I had to steal from my kids PC. Pretty interesting btw: it took 6 years from launch before 100K was broken, then another 9 years to break 200K, and finally 6 more years to break 300K. If we go back just one year the WR was still just 220K. 3D01 shows the standstill CPUs have been at very clearly, and the major leap that has happened just these last years.
- Xtreme Addict - GeForce GTX 980 Ti @ 1484/2164MHz - 291189 marks 3DMark2001 SE
- Rauf - GeForce GTX 980 Ti - 290368 marks 3DMark2001 SE
- elmor - Core i9 13900K @ 8812.8MHz - 8812.85 MHz CPU Frequency
- safedisk - Core i9 13900K(8P) @ 7777MHz - 92748 points Geekbench3 - Multi Core
-
[FS] 12900KS SP 98, 2 good G7400
Yes, it's still here
-
Intel opencl versions and performance in GPUPI 3.2
There are also different versions of the installer for open cl 2.1. one works fine and one gives error after loop 4. So make sure to use the one named 18.1, like example above. If it's named 2.1 it won't work, even though it should be the same version.
-
[FS] 12900KS SP 98, 2 good G7400
Sorry, I missed this. The KS is sold.
- CENS - GeForce RTX 3090 Ti @ 2955/1500MHz - 11676 points Unigine Superposition - 8K Optimized
-
[FS] 12900KS SP 98, 2 good G7400
#2 sold
-
[FS] 12900KS SP 98, 2 good G7400
Hi For sale some strong chips. 1: 12900KS - SP 98, Pcores 105, Ecores 86. X-chip but not the best LN2-chip. Ran 6.9 R20 P cores, but was also a bit weird on LN2 with some random crashes etc. Solid water chip though. - 600€ 2: G7400. 6.5GHz chip but never ran it maxed out for myself. Only used in intel comp by me. Chip nr 2 from this: https://community.hwbot.org/topic/216835-g7400-ln2/#comment-619648 - 100€ 3: G7400 bought from Luumi. He ran it 6.25-6.3GHz. I never even used it, bought it as a backup chip for the intel comp. - 75€