websmile

Titan Pascal is ruled out at stage rules - as far as I can see 2011-3 is not ruled out there, I will check with Asus if they want 2011-3 to participate or not, I think it would make sense because we wanted different systems for all stages to be useful

We cannot check hardware used at moderation atm... This makes things a bit hard for moderation and even harder for random results. The problem of this submission is not what you write, a screenshot is mandatory for the participation in the competition, and if you submit this screenshot under rig pictures instead of validation screenshot, you will not be able to particpate at the comp - normal submission for ranking worked as you can see at the linked result. We are also discussing verification rules atm, the way screenshot is made and added causes some problems for temperature limited comps, we have controversy about this Once again, no server hardware at all. The sentence about hardware having to be released at start of the competition refers to unreleased, new desktop stuff. You cannot use a 1080ti now for example even if you stole one at NV lab

Best you normally will get is XMP, try this - if it works, you can try to find memory timings at the OC section and try 10-12-12 maybe, but you will have to change from ez mode at BIOS advanced mode, and this can be a lot of try and error if you tune Timings, vccsa and io and dram voltage by hand. If you are patient, you can succeed so, all is about learning first

Looks good

Tracers sold

OK, what I overlooked but others saw... you have not taken the screenshot with the embedded screenshot tool of the benchmark, or at least you have no suzbmitted it as screenshot but as attachment like system picture. Because of this the submission does not mazch the competitions need for a valid screenshot and you can´t add it.

Hi, up for sale are two Crucial kits with Micron D9GMH/GKX, both are tested to work and are in good optical and technical condition. 1. 2x1GB Crucial BallistiX DDR2-800 Cl4-4-4-12 2,2v In good condition, decent clocker, 1200+ C5 are easy even on my Gigabyte X38 DS5. Micron D9Gxx, dual sided FD3. Bulk 2. 2x1GB Crucial BallistiX Tracer DDR2-1066 C5-5-5-15 2,2v The kit works flawless including the LEDs, good clocker that does 1200C5 and more easily for me. Micron D9Gxx, dual sided 16fd3, bulk. Prices 1. 20 Euros plus shipping 2. 25 Euros plus shipping sold and payment received Payment with Paypal only, buyer covers fees or gift payment. Shipping will be 5 or 7 euros depending on tracking or not. I strongly recommend tracking option bc I will not cover it if item is sent without it and gets stolen... Disclaimer: Private sale, no returns and no warranty provided by me therefore. Please accept this or simply don´t buy

Tasked the y cruncher problem, no idea what causes this, it worked before No server hardware at all, the sentence refers to hardware has to be released before the competion starts or it is not eligible

Sold, payment received Thanks for the space hwbot

Hi, for sale is my last 3600c16 RipjawsV kit in excellent condition. It was used for a couple of tests and benchmarks, with recent changes I do not need it anymore, so it can go now 1. 2x8GB G.Skill RipjawV DDR4-3600 C16-16-16-36 1,35v SN 1638A500xxxx, Samsung B-die, the kit is capable of running XTU and geekbench for example at 4000 12-11-11-28 1T 220 around 1,93-1,94v real, in XP 4000 12-12-12-28 1T 220 worked reliable with waza at around 1,95v. I also tested it for higher frequencies, around 4085 32m c12 waza ok (needs IMC, for geekbench and xtu limit for me on air mems and cpu was 4120-4133 at around 2,05v real. I had the kit on hold for a friend, but he did not message me anymore, so I decided to sell it here publicly. In original blister, retail. Price 145 Euros + shipping sold Payment is possible with paypal (buyer covers fees or gift payment) or western union, shipping will be around 11 Euros with deutsche Post worldwide, for DHL please contact me. Disclaimer: Private sale, no returns and no warranty provided by me therefore. Pleaseaccept this or simply don´t buy

For future questions about cc, please contact strunkenbold, I am out of hwbot service - thanks

No1Spank, I would strongly advise you read the rules for 3dmark again, especially on verification needs for screenshot. Screenshot needs launch app with benchsettings, fps result tab and so on.

Next time please watch what you dial in, it is 47k on result screenshot and not 49K like you posted - thx

There is nothing left to say here - Mods checked the score, and more important, FM checked it and rated it a valid score, and I see no need to discuss a general issue here. If some one searches for bugs, here is the wrong place

OK, for the 1155 stage it is indeed subfamilies, means i7,i5,i3 etc, eligible for use are sandy bridge and ivy bridge of both classes, each can only be used once to add to the result. Means you can use 3770K and 2600K, but when you add 2700K only one of these subs, 2600k or 2700k, will add to your result. Seems this was configured different from what was originally planned, might be more interesting though P.S. Checked all other stages now as well, no surprises anymore

Next stop 743

As far as I am concerned with the competition, my job is finished. The result to be found now at eoc-sports is final result from my side. Sadly the last open topic ended in disqualification of one contestant, nontheless it was a great competitions at highest level. Congratulations again to all, the top 12 are eligible for the awesome trip to Wuhan, China, for the finals. All other participants with a full set of scores (I asked Galax again, you need legit scores at all 4 stages) will participate in the lucky draw Thanks for a very professional competition, first of all to Galax for great collaboration, their good support of the benchers at the contest, especially Mad Tse and GaryNg, and for making this contest happen, and to all participants for awesome results and good sportsmanship

All results checked, the overall result is not final though. We are still investigating especially one result and have therefore suspended preliminarily a group of submissions by one user. Lots of greats results here, congratulations to all participants

Awesome memory frequency

Not bad, no slacking here

Now this is an efficient run - grats for the top spot on this

As said, we have similar observations at 290 and 390 amd cards lately and asked FM to check this out, like you said observation of framerates with tools and plausibility check is needed for this. We have a range of ~33 - ~37 at gt2 at the competition, and around 2500-2730 mems, this is simply not enough out of line for me to throw out results without check by FM, we have this option. In spite of 32m having no monitoring, it is somehow easier to see for me because variance by driverr version, settings like LOD and overall balance of cpu, dram and card frequencies is harder to dtermine in the end

Bad explanation by me - the raise of memory(Dram) boosted physics for stavros, but he lost on GPU score - when the tests are in line, both GT1 and GT2, on scaling with core and memory, we cannot say a run is bugged and delete it. This is what we currently invetigate on some AMD cards for firestrike where we see similar scaling. We also have runs at the competition which have lower core and sub 2600 mem and still beat your GT2 - are all of these runs bugged or are they a result of the balance that you have at system?

What I mean is that he upgraded score as you know, he did raise core - result was that he lost gt2 FPS at this despite memory being exactly the same. Seems balance of core and memory on cards makes a difference FireKillerGR`s 3DMark - Fire Strike Extreme score: 8885 marks with a GeForce GTX 1060

FireKillerGR`s 3DMark - Fire Strike Extreme score: 8846 marks with a GeForce GTX 1060 I Think a lot depends on core and mem balance - raising core brought lower gt2 for example for firekiller at same mem freq. We have atm some similar cases we investigate with FM