websmile

Sold, payment received Thanks for the space hwbot

Hi, for sale is my last 3600c16 RipjawsV kit in excellent condition. It was used for a couple of tests and benchmarks, with recent changes I do not need it anymore, so it can go now 1. 2x8GB G.Skill RipjawV DDR4-3600 C16-16-16-36 1,35v SN 1638A500xxxx, Samsung B-die, the kit is capable of running XTU and geekbench for example at 4000 12-11-11-28 1T 220 around 1,93-1,94v real, in XP 4000 12-12-12-28 1T 220 worked reliable with waza at around 1,95v. I also tested it for higher frequencies, around 4085 32m c12 waza ok (needs IMC, for geekbench and xtu limit for me on air mems and cpu was 4120-4133 at around 2,05v real. I had the kit on hold for a friend, but he did not message me anymore, so I decided to sell it here publicly. In original blister, retail. Price 145 Euros + shipping sold Payment is possible with paypal (buyer covers fees or gift payment) or western union, shipping will be around 11 Euros with deutsche Post worldwide, for DHL please contact me. Disclaimer: Private sale, no returns and no warranty provided by me therefore. Pleaseaccept this or simply don´t buy

For future questions about cc, please contact strunkenbold, I am out of hwbot service - thanks

No1Spank, I would strongly advise you read the rules for 3dmark again, especially on verification needs for screenshot. Screenshot needs launch app with benchsettings, fps result tab and so on.

Next time please watch what you dial in, it is 47k on result screenshot and not 49K like you posted - thx

There is nothing left to say here - Mods checked the score, and more important, FM checked it and rated it a valid score, and I see no need to discuss a general issue here. If some one searches for bugs, here is the wrong place

OK, for the 1155 stage it is indeed subfamilies, means i7,i5,i3 etc, eligible for use are sandy bridge and ivy bridge of both classes, each can only be used once to add to the result. Means you can use 3770K and 2600K, but when you add 2700K only one of these subs, 2600k or 2700k, will add to your result. Seems this was configured different from what was originally planned, might be more interesting though P.S. Checked all other stages now as well, no surprises anymore

Next stop 743

As far as I am concerned with the competition, my job is finished. The result to be found now at eoc-sports is final result from my side. Sadly the last open topic ended in disqualification of one contestant, nontheless it was a great competitions at highest level. Congratulations again to all, the top 12 are eligible for the awesome trip to Wuhan, China, for the finals. All other participants with a full set of scores (I asked Galax again, you need legit scores at all 4 stages) will participate in the lucky draw Thanks for a very professional competition, first of all to Galax for great collaboration, their good support of the benchers at the contest, especially Mad Tse and GaryNg, and for making this contest happen, and to all participants for awesome results and good sportsmanship

All results checked, the overall result is not final though. We are still investigating especially one result and have therefore suspended preliminarily a group of submissions by one user. Lots of greats results here, congratulations to all participants

Awesome memory frequency

Not bad, no slacking here

Now this is an efficient run - grats for the top spot on this

As said, we have similar observations at 290 and 390 amd cards lately and asked FM to check this out, like you said observation of framerates with tools and plausibility check is needed for this. We have a range of ~33 - ~37 at gt2 at the competition, and around 2500-2730 mems, this is simply not enough out of line for me to throw out results without check by FM, we have this option. In spite of 32m having no monitoring, it is somehow easier to see for me because variance by driverr version, settings like LOD and overall balance of cpu, dram and card frequencies is harder to dtermine in the end

Bad explanation by me - the raise of memory(Dram) boosted physics for stavros, but he lost on GPU score - when the tests are in line, both GT1 and GT2, on scaling with core and memory, we cannot say a run is bugged and delete it. This is what we currently invetigate on some AMD cards for firestrike where we see similar scaling. We also have runs at the competition which have lower core and sub 2600 mem and still beat your GT2 - are all of these runs bugged or are they a result of the balance that you have at system?

What I mean is that he upgraded score as you know, he did raise core - result was that he lost gt2 FPS at this despite memory being exactly the same. Seems balance of core and memory on cards makes a difference FireKillerGR`s 3DMark - Fire Strike Extreme score: 8885 marks with a GeForce GTX 1060

FireKillerGR`s 3DMark - Fire Strike Extreme score: 8846 marks with a GeForce GTX 1060 I Think a lot depends on core and mem balance - raising core brought lower gt2 for example for firekiller at same mem freq. We have atm some similar cases we investigate with FM

There will be no need for a video proof on this, the available memory, startup and loops speak for themselves, Very good kit, would buy myself, you will not need the kit for hwbot benching for a while, sorry to say this. You could have asked for support, a lot of guys would have hellped you to run waza 32m and show and explain it to you at community, but you prefer a stunt...

This is no problem, the screenshot and links need to be OK, most likely it is database

Goo, Luumi

We can discuss this a long time, let´s see what FM says. This might be an excellent example why Futuremark sometimes disapproves drivers, even whql ones, like on nearly all results linked here, because some of them simply bug at benchmarking - we will see

More or less last call for the qualifier, it will end tomorrow... Check you results for the frequency cap of 6003.00 on the screenshots and also on fm links, please check if needed tabs are shown and if CPUZ and GPUZ versions are 1,77 respectively 1.11 and newer. Good luck

You can submit, but it will not count to the teams score. Each team member can only distribute one result per stage

Yes, different models of the same cpu main family, so from SB 2600k and 2700k are allowed and both count to ranking

Thanks, no chance I sell at this price^^