flanker

wow man!

very nice!

I tested it and for Cinebench or XTU was cache so unstable more than around 3800 MHz (1.45-1.5V at cache). CPU tops almost 5050 MHz, but afterall I have results only with 5 GHz. 5050 dont saved, frozed it Elmor: ufff 1.7 V is relative high Im afraid, maybe enxt time, but I cant kill the chip...

wow! Again new WR

Guys, 3200 MHz memory dividier working at your side? Thx.

as always very good

but be carefull man

nice , with IDe your CPU will flying

Its not mine, I found it at UK forum But I had no issues with my 5150 at 2100+ MHz at DRAM

Its not true, did you forgot at Phenoms II? The best months with LN2 ever, it destroy Lynfields etc (more than +1GHz OC fun) and Phenoms II x6 were better than lynfield in price/performance ration. The multithread was the same as 4c/8T Intels CPU, OC was similar, IMC was similar. Only in Superpi or old benchamrks at one core were Phenoms II a bit worse than Intel. x4 965 BE performance is average as i5-750 x6 1090T BE is as i7-950 or i7-870 PS:clock to clock is something as apples and pears, because you cant compare different architectures (only if the basic is the same, example family 15h or 10h or SB vs IB generation etc)

now are Bristols in OEM HP PCs...I hope in few months they must relased out for normal customers.

O knew it ...congratulation

4400 MHz at CPU is nice...what your cache, did you tried more (around 3.9-4 GHz?) PS: Im happy, local Intel will borow me 6950X for one week

heh Maybe XA has some secret score +1 point up

nice man!

wow man!

OC pack for 10 Edition will working for old R5E also?

Did you found this core via best core in Turboboost 3.0 max?

nice man!

crazy CPU!

GTX 1080 Strix hands on by Roman

not much, I tried it only quickly around 2500 MHz effective via FSB bus. This combo will be in my second home PC, but Im waiting for PC Case Bitfenix. So will try it later after the setup will be complete

I found this! 3 GHz Cineebcnh at this small CPU http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h313/2000gtv4/cpu/3.16%20cinr152_zps9msru4wq.png

@Massman: did you tried for higher BCLK change the "APU 1.2V" settings? This helped at my side.

I found my 1.6V results now Im sure, I tested it also with 1.55V and same settings ( I tried many combination how to get higher BCLK, lowr voltages at CPU/NB included)