NoMS

Nice! :)

Yeah, I must admit that I almost didn't believe when i saw this thing working just fine with such ram clock... C7H is a hardware masterpiece!

Sure, here is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F9UZbOka6Po Sorry for my bad cam and for this video, I ran the benchmark @ 4400MHz 1.425V because of higher ambient temperature today (~27ºC, was around 20ºC when I firstly tested these chips), here is the 4425 run: http://www.hwbot.org/submission/3872240_

R5 2600X - 1802SUS 0255 - WC (Custom Loop) Cinebench R15 @ 4225 1.35V / 4300 1.425V R5 2600X - 1802SUS 0273 - WC (Custom Loop) Cinebench R15 @ 4325 1.35V / 4425 1.425V Next month I will try this 0273 chip under LN2, at least on water it seems to be a killer chip! ?

R5 1600X - 1713SUS - WC (Custom Loop) Cinebench R15 @ 4125MHz 1.52V and 5.05GHz 1.72V @ -150ºC using a ASUS Prime B350-Plus for this same benchmark. R5 2400G - 1750SUT - WC (Custom Loop) Cinebench R15 @ 3975MHz 1.52V and 1600~1625MHz 1.25V for GPU (3dmarks). This chip seems to be a dud... R3 2200G - 1749SUT - WC (Custom Loop) Cinebench R15 @ 4150MHz 1.55V and 1700~1725MHz 1.25V for GPU (3dmarks). R5 2600X - 1802SUS 0255 - WC (Custom Loop) Cinebench R15 @ 4225 1.35V / 4300 1.425V R5 2600X - 1802SUS 0273 - WC (Custom Loop) Cinebench R15 @ 4325 1.35V / 4425 1.425V and 5625MHz under LN2, very strong IMC, it did 4000 CL12 for Cinebench R15.

Thanks Flank3r. Already managed to improve this score a bit just pushing the rams to 3533MHz and IGPU to 1600MHz. :) http://www.hwbot.org/submission/3795469_noms_3dmark11___performance_radeon_rx_vega_11_7151_marks

Opa, beleza cara? Primeiramente bem-vindo ao time! Sobre o seu resultado, o screenshot está fora dos padrões das regras do HWBOT, ele precisa ser conforme esse exemplo e deve ser uma imagem única: https://hwbotstatic.s3.amazonaws.com/img/examples/wPrime%20-%2032M.png Valeu!

Começou forte mas está faltando o wallpaper oficial da competição, conforme está nas regras. https://hwbotnews.s3.amazonaws.com/Competitions/1970_Team_Brazil_GPUPI_Challenge/tb1.png

Well done!

3DM01 would not be a better choice than 3DM03? I'm asking this because 3DM03 does not run on older Matrox cards like G450 (DX6.0) and it would basically limit the competition to Parhelia/Millenium only.

A small update: He submitted a lot of results today and until now, no issues. Thank you guys!

From what he told me, yes. As I already said if I try to edit his results, the "disable points" option appears unchecked for me.

Aaaand it happened again. claudiohonio`s 3DMark - Fire Strike Ultra score: 5863 marks with a GeForce GTX 1080 claudiohonio`s 3DMark - Fire Strike Extreme score: 10800 marks with a GeForce GTX 1080 claudiohonio`s 3DMark - Fire Strike score: 18760 marks with a GeForce GTX 1080

It's still broken, he re-uploaded his best TS score with FM link but it says that points are disabled. I've tried to edit his result but it doesn't work as expected (disabled point checkbox always show as unchecked for me). claudiohonio`s 3DMark - Time Spy score: 7424 marks with a GeForce GTX 1080 FM Link: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-4770K,ASRock H87 Pro4

Already told that to him, he will re-upload the results with link included. Thank you!

He ran 3dmarks with latest systeminfo and put ORB links in all his submissions, so it's fine. I think that table is very clear about this subject:

Hey, This is the rookie in question: claudiohonio @ HWBOT Why his points is disable? He asked me why he has no points and I throught that he disabled points by accident but it doesn't seems to be the case. Is it possible to someone fix this? Thanks!

Intel is fine on Blender... Throttling issues maybe? Anyway, for this challenge should we use default 200 samples or 100 like AMD used in Ryzen demo?

Thank you guys!

Thank you bro.

Thank you guys! @Casanova, uma pena que o CPU apresentou esse fsbwall baixo, ele parecia ser mais promissor que isso... Mas de qualquer forma, pra um ES antigo como esse acho que já fez até demais.

Nice!

Boa!!!

Nice find @newlife !