Guest Sinebrychof Posted July 2, 2017 Posted July 2, 2017 Testing efficiency at 500x9 and close to breaking 9m50s at that config. Quote
TaPaKaH Posted July 2, 2017 Posted July 2, 2017 Do you want for people to beat you by running tighter subs or via a faster OS? Or, perhaps, just "cheat" via 642x7? Quote
Guest Sinebrychof Posted July 2, 2017 Posted July 2, 2017 500x9 is my preferance Sam but it couldn't be set as a limiting factor . To just test memory and OS efficiency at that configuration. Quote
Noxinite Posted July 2, 2017 Posted July 2, 2017 (edited) I'm up for that. Challenge accepted. Edited July 3, 2017 by Noxinite Quote
suzuki Posted July 3, 2017 Posted July 3, 2017 This is amazing,subbed. Keep on posting in here the results. good luck. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro Quote
Noxinite Posted July 3, 2017 Posted July 3, 2017 Noxinite`s SuperPi - 32M score: 9min 47sec 578ms with a Core 2 Duo E8500 Quote
Guest Sinebrychof Posted July 4, 2017 Posted July 4, 2017 http://hwbot.org/submission/3592074_luumi_superpi___32m_core_2_duo_e8600_9min_47sec_468ms?recalculate=true Quote
suzuki Posted July 4, 2017 Posted July 4, 2017 Lol ,the man with the sand . Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro Quote
Noxinite Posted July 5, 2017 Posted July 5, 2017 (edited) Noxinite`s SuperPi - 32M score: 9min 47sec 391ms with a Core 2 Duo E8500 FYI I had down to 9m 47.219s with a bit of tweaking, but overwrote OS with screens on while benching for team cup. Edited July 5, 2017 by Noxinite Quote
Guest Sinebrychof Posted July 5, 2017 Posted July 5, 2017 Luumi`s SuperPi - 32M score: 9min 46sec 937ms with a Core 2 Duo E8600 Quote
Noxinite Posted July 5, 2017 Posted July 5, 2017 I've done PiFast now, so I'll be back tomorrow. Quote
Guest Sinebrychof Posted July 5, 2017 Posted July 5, 2017 Yeah sadly I put too short timeframe. I mainly wanted to see where my efficiency stands. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.