Testing efficiency at 500x9 and close to breaking 9m50s at that config.

Do you want for people to beat you by running tighter subs or via a faster OS? Or, perhaps, just "cheat" via 642x7?

500x9 is my preferance Sam but it couldn't be set as a limiting factor . To just test memory and OS efficiency at that configuration.

I'm up for that. Challenge accepted.

Edited July 3, 20179 yr by Noxinite

This is amazing,subbed. Keep on posting in here the results. good luck.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Noxinite`s SuperPi - 32M score: 9min 47sec 578ms with a Core 2 Duo E8500

 

Great run noxi.

Noxinite's wr1 500 fsb setup ! Nice run !

 

http://hwbot.org/submission/3592074_luumi_superpi___32m_core_2_duo_e8600_9min_47sec_468ms?recalculate=true

Lol ,the man with the sand .

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Noxinite`s SuperPi - 32M score: 9min 47sec 391ms with a Core 2 Duo E8500

 

FYI I had down to 9m 47.219s with a bit of tweaking, but overwrote OS with screens on while benching for team cup.

Edited July 5, 20179 yr by Noxinite

Luumi`s SuperPi - 32M score: 9min 46sec 937ms with a Core 2 Duo E8600

 

I've done PiFast now, so I'll be back tomorrow.

Yeah sadly I put too short timeframe. I mainly wanted to see where my efficiency stands.