Massman Posted February 9, 2011 Posted February 9, 2011 (I am now also posting my sub-par OC results ) As I mentioned in the HWBOT batch thread earlier: tested a new L046B632 2600K from Tones.be. I was hoping to stumble upon one of those magical 5.8G chips, but unfortunatelly this particular sample isn't overclocking so very well. So far, it's the only OC result I've seen with this FPO, so you might go for it anyway and hope you have more than I . Max of the CPU is ~ 5150MHz (no OS at 52x100). BCLK ~ 106MHz. Here are some pictures: And a SuperPI-32M result: Hopefully more luck in the future . Quote
TaPaKaH Posted February 9, 2011 Posted February 9, 2011 may be it has something to do with very benching-friendly memory you're using? (16gb = too much stress for imc) Quote
Splave Posted February 9, 2011 Posted February 9, 2011 lol massman trying to find cpu max with 16gb? your better than that mate! Quote
Massman Posted February 9, 2011 Author Posted February 9, 2011 may be it has something to do with very benching-friendly memory you're using? (16gb = too much stress for imc) The flickering '_' in the upper-left corner is not a sign of IMC being stressed . lol massman trying to find cpu max with 16gb? your better than that mate! What can I say ... I like the extra challenge? Quote
Christian Ney Posted February 9, 2011 Posted February 9, 2011 Real memory -1 Available memory -1 Massman is Chuck Norris Quote
Crew Turrican Posted February 9, 2011 Crew Posted February 9, 2011 Real memory -1Available memory -1 Massman is Chuck Norris rofl when you use a 64bit OS it always says -1, because on a 64bit OS applications can use more than 2gb per process. super pi doesn't "know" more than 2gb, because it's a 32bit application i guess. Quote
Christian Ney Posted February 9, 2011 Posted February 9, 2011 (edited) Why are you obligated to prove that Massman is not Chuck Norris EDIT: Edited February 9, 2011 by Christian Ney Quote
Massman Posted February 10, 2011 Author Posted February 10, 2011 MAX: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1647444 Quote
TaPaKaH Posted February 10, 2011 Posted February 10, 2011 is that 9-9-9 being misread or you have the new ultimate benching memory? Quote
Massman Posted February 10, 2011 Author Posted February 10, 2011 It's actually 9-11-9. Or else I'd have the first 16GB CL6-6-6 kit Quote
Christian Ney Posted February 10, 2011 Posted February 10, 2011 Massman is Chuck Norris again QED Quote
Massman Posted February 10, 2011 Author Posted February 10, 2011 @ Christian: Off the record, triple thumbs up for using the latin expression 'quod erat demonstrandum Quote
Christian Ney Posted February 10, 2011 Posted February 10, 2011 I deserve no less than 200 Global points Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.