Posted June 5, 20213 yr Impressive clocks! Do GDM Off, tRAS 21, and tRC 29 all not work for you? You may want to try higher fclk or unlinked. Is this a bugged run?
June 5, 20213 yr 2 hours ago, Sparky's__Adventure said: Impressive clocks! Do GDM Off, tRAS 21, and tRC 29 all not work for you? You may want to try higher fclk or unlinked. Is this a bugged run? ? ? Memory Latency 42079 10.3 ns
June 5, 20213 yr Hi it is not a bugged run I just found goods parameters to have the best results, no I optain the best performance with theses settings it is because I give it to the community
June 5, 20213 yr Crew one does not jump from 11K to 18K in memory score without bugging the benchmark... Provide the maxmem setting plz ? I hope you don't believe that your parameters allow you to beat scores with the same hardware clocked 500-700Mhz higher...
June 5, 20213 yr Crew That's where it comes from... at G.Skill booth we did not accept below 1.5G to prevent bugged outputs....
June 5, 20213 yr It is just the ryzen 5000 architecture, there is only 2 thinks to optain this low latency, find the good core and limitate the amount of ram
June 5, 20213 yr Crew it also works on Intel... geek bugs with too low available memory, seems I will need to go and clean up some scores...
June 5, 20213 yr it is just the optimisation of this benchmark not a bug, you can try the same think : 1G ram, desable SMT and put the affinity on the core 2 ...
June 5, 20213 yr Crew I fail to see the optimisation of the benchmark when you boost 80% in memory score and you beat way higher clocked setups. It's intentional bugging the output...
June 5, 20213 yr so I can do a score with 2G maxmem it is good ? I think it could be mentioned in the rules
June 5, 20213 yr Crew Well perform a test, change maxmem to 1.5GB & re-run, afterwards set 2G maxmem & re-run. For me this is common sense something to grasp something is not right. Either the Top 5 in that ranking suck monkey balls or you are too darn good...
June 5, 20213 yr ok I m going to do a 2G and a 1.5G score with the 5600x and the 5800x can you remove my scores GB4 single of this two processors please
June 6, 20213 yr 13 hours ago, Leeghoofd said: it also works on Intel... geek bugs with too low available memory, seems I will need to go and clean up some scores... GB4 Single Core scores with <1.5GB Maxmem as far as the current global top 30: https://hwbot.org/submission/4753151_rauf_geekbench4___single_core_core_i9_11900kf_11450_points/ https://hwbot.org/submission/4726111_safedisk_geekbench4___single_core_core_i9_11900k_11409_points/ https://hwbot.org/submission/4752362_sergmann_geekbench4___single_core_core_i9_11900k_11363_points/ https://hwbot.org/submission/4722432_noizemaker_geekbench4___single_core_core_i9_11900kf_11232_points/ https://hwbot.org/submission/4511897_davestarrr_geekbench4___single_core_core_i9_10900k_9919_points/ https://hwbot.org/submission/4142526_ale_belo_geekbench4___single_core_core_i7_8700k_9868_points/ https://hwbot.org/submission/4194819_xmec_geekbench4___single_core_core_i7_8700k_9780_points/
June 6, 20213 yr 6 minutes ago, Leeghoofd said: Most logic step might be to remove globals sadly... Reason we have Mat and benchmate. Loop hole wizzards are gonna loop hole estimate 25% of top scores 50. 1000mb done.
June 6, 20213 yr Crew 7 hours ago, endpunkt said: This is the third biggest safedisk. Looks fine Reported this exact score back in November due to the insanely low latency, was told it was fine and a tweak Keep said he wanted to reproduce score sometime but did not want to share the tweak Edited June 6, 20213 yr by Gunzi
June 6, 20213 yr 2 hours ago, Gunzi said: Reported this exact score back in November due to the insanely low latency, was told it was fine and a tweak Keep said he wanted to reproduce score sometime but did not want to share the tweak At this stage that one clears. It's look for obvious ones first 1000mb done _____________ https://hwbot.org/submission/4731907_kansaï_geekbench4___single_core_core_i9_11900k_9358_points/ When I was running my processor. I'm looking at this score, mems are at 4900 Does not mean it is a bad score like some of the others. It's extremely fast + fast timing. BUT. Done 1000mb. Even 2000 max mem it may not run. That is the point, not equal to others doing bench correct
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.