ok

I wish luck to all, I have no nerve to do.

do not close.....

Will go over the different entries with MSI tomorrow

- JohnAMD's 680 32M results were not valid due to lack of matching CPU-Z result in stage 1

- OC Genie's 32M result was removed because the screenshot did not match the video

 

Lapinoux and Clon22 are the winners of the competition.

 

Now following up on the voting contest at Facebook Fanpage.

Congratz Lapinoux and Clon22

I do not understand, though the latter was wrong, then the previous sp32 sec 9.10? why?

There's no CPU-Z video validation for that 680 processor, only for your i7 870. To have a valid SuperPI-32M score, you also needed to have a valid CPU-Z video.

8.42 The registration has ratified neither the registration 9.10; Are you working;

That result is with the same i5 680: http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2162530_johnamd_superpi_32m_core_i5_680_9min_10sec_11ms

Why Is Failed?

You don't have a CPU-Z validation video for that i5 680

 

You can make ... 4 submissions.

 

2x with 870, 2x with 680. In both cases, 32M must be with the same frequency as CPU-Z.

THIS IS VIDEO IS NOT VALID?

There was no submission in CPU-Z stage ...

for o.2 hz speak? physiological differences between the inertia system and full load cpu.

thou say it is not upload it to stage1?

thou say it is not upload it to stage1?

 

http://hwbot.org/listResults.do?contestBenchmarkId=194&limit=200&order=user.country.name&filterBlocked=true

 

I don't see i5 680 score?

After I had seen a greater oc% if uploads stage1 will not give

really sorry!