DeM03 Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 ok Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeGaL^CriMeR Posted April 30, 2011 Share Posted April 30, 2011 I wish luck to all, I have no nerve to do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnamd Posted April 30, 2011 Share Posted April 30, 2011 do not close..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 Will go over the different entries with MSI tomorrow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted May 2, 2011 Share Posted May 2, 2011 - JohnAMD's 680 32M results were not valid due to lack of matching CPU-Z result in stage 1 - OC Genie's 32M result was removed because the screenshot did not match the video  Lapinoux and Clon22 are the winners of the competition.  Now following up on the voting contest at Facebook Fanpage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted May 2, 2011 Author Share Posted May 2, 2011 Congratz Lapinoux and Clon22 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnamd Posted May 2, 2011 Share Posted May 2, 2011 I do not understand, though the latter was wrong, then the previous sp32 sec 9.10? why? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted May 2, 2011 Share Posted May 2, 2011 There's no CPU-Z video validation for that 680 processor, only for your i7 870. To have a valid SuperPI-32M score, you also needed to have a valid CPU-Z video. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnamd Posted May 2, 2011 Share Posted May 2, 2011 8.42 The registration has ratified neither the registration 9.10; Are you working; Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted May 2, 2011 Share Posted May 2, 2011 That result is with the same i5 680: http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2162530_johnamd_superpi_32m_core_i5_680_9min_10sec_11ms Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnamd Posted May 2, 2011 Share Posted May 2, 2011 Why Is Failed? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted May 2, 2011 Share Posted May 2, 2011 You don't have a CPU-Z validation video for that i5 680  You can make ... 4 submissions. 2x with 870, 2x with 680. In both cases, 32M must be with the same frequency as CPU-Z. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnamd Posted May 2, 2011 Share Posted May 2, 2011 THIS IS VIDEO IS NOT VALID? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted May 2, 2011 Share Posted May 2, 2011 There was no submission in CPU-Z stage ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnamd Posted May 2, 2011 Share Posted May 2, 2011 for o.2 hz speak? physiological differences between the inertia system and full load cpu. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnamd Posted May 2, 2011 Share Posted May 2, 2011 thou say it is not upload it to stage1? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted May 2, 2011 Share Posted May 2, 2011 thou say it is not upload it to stage1?  http://hwbot.org/listResults.do?contestBenchmarkId=194&limit=200&order=user.country.name&filterBlocked=true  I don't see i5 680 score? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnamd Posted May 2, 2011 Share Posted May 2, 2011 After I had seen a greater oc% if uploads stage1 will not give Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnamd Posted May 2, 2011 Share Posted May 2, 2011 really sorry! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.