OverDozeD Posted March 31, 2009 Share Posted March 31, 2009 (edited) What did I wrong in these 2 submissions? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=833773 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=833771 2009-03-29 06:12:24.0 - (crew) demiurg: insufficient verification for rankings (Please provide more verification. The submission must clearly show 3Dmark score, 3Dmark subtest scores, 3Dmark settings unless you provide a futuremark orb link. See http://www.hwbot.org/hwbot.post.do?postId=1038) Why should I provide valid ORB link? If u cant see CLEAR 3DMark score it's ONLY your problem! Edited March 31, 2009 by OverDozeD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted March 31, 2009 Share Posted March 31, 2009 The subtest scores are missing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OverDozeD Posted March 31, 2009 Author Share Posted March 31, 2009 The subtest scores are missing What you can tell about this? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=803127 It's unfair IMHO There's clearly shown 3Dmark score! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xoqolatl Posted March 31, 2009 Share Posted March 31, 2009 If I remember correctly, you have to provide either a valid ORB link or a screenshot with details tab in 3DMark window visible (showing fps for each test). Your results has no ORB link and no details visible, only the final score. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted March 31, 2009 Share Posted March 31, 2009 I believe that a score that has some minor problems with the screenshot will still be valid - but only if the score is normal for the HW. So if you used alot of tweaks (and the score reflects that), then a screenshot without the subtest window is not enough (unless you have an ORB link). If it was run on an unoptimized rig, then it would be OK. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OverDozeD Posted March 31, 2009 Author Share Posted March 31, 2009 (edited) Actually I run vista64 home basic version without ANY tweaks and answer on this validation please http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=803127 I believe that a score that has some minor problems with the screenshot will still be valid - but only if the score is normal for the HW GeForce GTX 260 216 @ 756/1264mhz i7 920 @ 42000 mhz 2000 mhz CL7 I think that's quite normal settings for 32002 score @ 3Dmark 2005 Edited March 31, 2009 by OverDozeD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K404 Posted March 31, 2009 Share Posted March 31, 2009 How strongly enforced is the score breakdown guideline? When did it come into effect? I can think of a lot of submissions without score breakdowns. I cant see why anyone wouldnt add them- its good to see where the score comes from..but thats deffo just opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OverDozeD Posted April 1, 2009 Author Share Posted April 1, 2009 I can think of a lot of submissions without score breakdowns. I know what's reason of it demiurg is russian and just gets annoyed when georgan team makes any good result! Actually that's the reason for deleting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 The one and only reason of blocking your scores is non-compliance with the rules Please stop unfounded accusing me of preconception. I had never blocked any result based on nationality of the bencher. You are making a big mistake, accusing me of such things. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=803127 This score has been submitted _before_ new edition of the rules. Please read the rules carefully at least one time! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 I know what's reason of itdemiurg is russian and just gets annoyed when georgan team makes any good result! Actually that's the reason for deleting. Hwbot does not care about any political issue, not between Russia/Georgia, not between USA/Iran, not between Flanders/Wallons, ... The reason why your score was blocked is, as Demiurg already said, violation of the submission rules set by hwbot. Note that no one says your score is cheated in any form. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OverDozeD Posted April 1, 2009 Author Share Posted April 1, 2009 (edited) The one and only reason of blocking your scores is non-compliance with the rules Please stop unfounded accusing me of preconception. I had never blocked any result based on nationality of the bencher. You are making a big mistake, accusing me of such things. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=803127 This score has been submitted _before_ new edition of the rules. Please read the rules carefully at least one time! OK, whatever... go and keep working, you have a lot to do... I'm sorry guys if I made any kind of unfounded accusing, I really don't wanted do that. I just read new changes in rules and everything is clear now anyway my results deserves to be a valid IMHO. Edited April 1, 2009 by OverDozeD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westsider Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 u guys should work a little bit better u know it just OC and fun nothing personal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 Do all the mods agree to the fact that reasonable scores shouldn't be blocked if the missing part isn't vital? You should discuss this a little bit, as it's pretty clear that Demiurg followed the rules strictly, and jmke uses more "common sense". It's not fair that score removal depends on which mod that looks at the screenshot. Also, any mod that earns points on a score removal should NOT decide the "fate" of that submission. It's called conflict of interest... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westsider Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 its too strictly its nonsence if its 3way or 4 way multi gpu possibility,than yes it must be blocked but gpuz still shows the amount of used gpus only crossX scores should be controlled but if somebodys benching 2x295 and he istn showing it with gpuz i find its ok because if he validates it as 2x295it has no problems problem would be if he validates it as 1x295 but there are no other possibilities to bench 295 in multigpu mode just example Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 its too strictlyits nonsence if its 3way or 4 way multi gpu possibility,than yes it must be blocked but gpuz still shows the amount of used gpus only crossX scores should be controlled but if somebodys benching 2x295 and he istn showing it with gpuz i find its ok because if he validates it as 2x295it has no problems problem would be if he validates it as 1x295 but there are no other possibilities to bench 295 in multigpu mode just example If you submit in SLI or CF I cant see that the missing dropdown menu makes a difference at all:p After all, by submitting a single-GPU score in those ranks will give you less points than if it was submitted in the correct one. IMO this issue looks a bit like the one with the old 1m versions, without decimals. When you don't know the decimals, you set it to the "worst case scenario" - 99. Same here, you don't know the number of CPUs, you assume it's 3 or 4, and move them to SLI or CF - unless it's OBVIOUS that it's a single card. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 Also, any mod that earns points on a score removal should NOT decide the "fate" of that submission. It's called conflict of interest... Good point. I`ll try to check this more carefully. From 20/01/09 there is the rule about 3Dmark subtest window and everybody mast follow the rule. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westsider Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 ok if we follow strictly:demiurg has right! thats experience for you gio next time u wont forget it relax take it easy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OverDozeD Posted April 1, 2009 Author Share Posted April 1, 2009 (edited) Good point. I`ll try to check this more carefully. From 20/01/09 there is the rule about 3Dmark subtest window and everybody mast follow the rule. Yes mylord! Promise not to give you any kind of work on my submissions next time relax take it easy ok, i'll do so Thread closed! Edited April 1, 2009 by OverDozeD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.