knopflerbruce Posted December 12, 2011 Share Posted December 12, 2011 So, how does this compare to sandy bridge for example? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted December 13, 2011 Author Share Posted December 13, 2011 (edited) Okay ChipHell removed pics, I managed to recover the pics and upload them again in my gallery. Enjoy: http://hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?p=142060&postcount=22 Edited December 13, 2011 by Christian Ney Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted December 13, 2011 Author Share Posted December 13, 2011 So, how does this compare to sandy bridge for example? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaPaKaH Posted December 13, 2011 Share Posted December 13, 2011 so it's 1841 degrees hotter in 06 than 2700K, very informative Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted December 13, 2011 Author Share Posted December 13, 2011 (edited) Oops , I took the diagram of my latest review and changed the values, missed the x line info EDIT: Fixed Edited December 13, 2011 by Christian Ney Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted December 13, 2011 Share Posted December 13, 2011 So basically it's just an IGP upgrade. Unless it does 5.5 on air, no reason to upgrade for a 24/7 user:D I wonder if it's got the same walls as SB/SB-E. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flanker Posted December 14, 2011 Share Posted December 14, 2011 nice Christian...If I remember right, 3770K has 3.5/3.9 GHz? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted December 14, 2011 Author Share Posted December 14, 2011 First post snipped... Come on Intel, you are not funny 2 weeks late though Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted December 15, 2011 Author Share Posted December 15, 2011 Blablablabla....Please note that this information was obtained illegally. Blablablabla...[/Quote] Prove it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sin0822 Posted December 17, 2011 Share Posted December 17, 2011 sad they snipped it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted December 23, 2011 Author Share Posted December 23, 2011 (edited) Over the next few months, Intel will be releasing several server and workstation class processors based on Sandy Bridge. Entry level workstation offerings include E3-1200 v2 and E5-1600, both reliable alternatives to regular desktop offerings. Dual socket processors include the E5-2400 series and the higher performing E5-2600. Finally, we have the quad socket E5-4600 series. We have now seen some initial performance comparisons between Sandy Bridge-EP and Westmere-EP. A document leaked by a Chinese website (PDF file) revealed what sort of performance increase we can expect in Sandy Bridge-EP over Westmere-EP. Various benchmarks were run using an X5690 (with 6 cores/12 threads at 3.46 GHz base clock, 3.6GHz Turbo Clock) and an E5-2690 (8 cores/16 threads at 2.9 GHz), in a dual-socket setup with comparable configuration, except that the X5690 had 40 GB of DDR3-1333 in triple channel configuration and the E5-2680 had 32GB DDR3-1600 in quad channel configuration. Giving the X5690 a baseline score of 1 in each test, we see some interesting results. Both chips have a similar TDP. The X5690 has a core speed 24% higher than E5-2690, but the latter has 33% more cores. Using the synthetic Linpack benchmark to measure matrix multiplication, E5-2690 scored a respectable 2.2. Using OLTP Database (TPC-C Oracle), E5-2690 scores 1.5, while using a middle tier java test (SPECjbb 2005) the score is 1.56. Integer throughput using SPECint_base2006 gives a score of 1.69. Moving to some technical computing tasks, Floating Point Throughput (SPECfp*_rate_base2006) gave a score of 1.82 and Memory Bandwidth (STREAM_MP Triad) scored 1.88. The average performance over these 6 applications is approx 1.78, indicating a projected performance increase of approximately 80% when moving from the high-end Westmere-EP offering to the equivalent Sandy Bridge-EP processor. Comparing the Xeon 5600, E5-2400 and E5-2600 we can see the benefits of the newer systems, and why the E5-2600 series is so powerful. Source: CPUWorld Gallery: http://imup.se/g/BVUoc1 pdf available: https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0B0BeZFb-M9wCZWJjMGMwMjItNDNlZi00MGI1LWJiNDctZTliOTEwMDhhNGE0 Download all pics : .rar file Edited December 23, 2011 by Christian Ney Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted January 10, 2012 Author Share Posted January 10, 2012 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
|ron Posted January 10, 2012 Share Posted January 10, 2012 Uhm.. Chris, cpuz seems edited in the cache area, you see that bright spot around the number 10? Anyway, probably a 3dm11 monster at a friendly price of 1999USD :lol: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted January 10, 2012 Author Share Posted January 10, 2012 Yeah saw that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.