|ron Posted December 9, 2009 Posted December 9, 2009 -80/-100 was an example to say that we tried everything between -30 and -100 with 2cpus and 2mobos... Quote
|ron Posted December 9, 2009 Posted December 9, 2009 We found that giving a VTT upper than 1,6 was resulting in a no-post situation... So, if I'm not mistaken, we were around 1,55, but we tried also upper to 1,6 and under that value Tried to go with 1core, 2cores, 4 cores and with every combination HT enabled or disabled... the better combination with either the gd80 adn 65 was 4core with HT enabled. Quote
Massman Posted December 9, 2009 Author Posted December 9, 2009 I assume you also know this: Â - If you plan to use 1.6V VTT, increase the PCH 1.05V to 1.3V. I've asked MSI to make this happen automatically, but this is the key to make it happen. The reason is really simple: PCH is integrated on uncore die, so ... Â I had the exact same issue with VTT. By increasing the PCH => solved Quote
|ron Posted December 9, 2009 Posted December 9, 2009 We always used 1,3 or 1,35volts to pch, infact it was the most stable setting Quote
Massman Posted December 9, 2009 Author Posted December 9, 2009 Hm, did you test all bioses? IIRC, I had the best results with the 1.3B2. Â (or 1.5B8) Quote
|ron Posted December 9, 2009 Posted December 9, 2009 uhm... if I well remember the 1,3 was the originally mounted bios on the gd80... then we flashed the 1.5 official. In the last bench session we flashed the 1.5b8... same results with each bios. Quote
|ron Posted December 13, 2009 Posted December 13, 2009 Congrats to everybody involved in the competition, hwbot staff too But there's a thing I really hate, I must admit: what's the sense to post the results 1minute before the competition ends? It's not an ebay auction, I really don't see where is fair play. I'm not saying so because we didn't win (infact we were out of games a week ago), but I think that it's not the way to partecipate a competition. Maybe it's only my opinion, but I like to say what I think, always. See you in the next competition guys! Quote
|ron Posted December 13, 2009 Posted December 13, 2009 Hi rich, trust me if I say that my intent was not to see the winner disqualified, just my 2cents. Sure, if in the future you'll prevent that, I can do nothing but support your decision Quote
CoFoKrypton Posted December 13, 2009 Posted December 13, 2009 I think that the definition of "a picture of your overclocking rig" is too vague, maybe you should think of a clear definition for the next competition. Quote
Massman Posted December 13, 2009 Author Posted December 13, 2009 Seems to me that most people understood "picture of overclocking rig" Quote
Topalof Posted December 13, 2009 Posted December 13, 2009 and WR wPrime with bug cpu-z and coef 15x239 valided!? Quote
CoFoKrypton Posted December 13, 2009 Posted December 13, 2009 Well, to me this is not a picture of an overclocking rig: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=924026&title=Highest%20score%20of%20coolaler If you think that the definition is clear you have to be consequent and exclude such scores from the competition... Quote
ocisfun Posted December 13, 2009 Posted December 13, 2009 32m of hwNOT also looks photochopped - appears that some shortcuts underneath left edge of 32m window were sloppily cut off Quote
ocisfun Posted December 13, 2009 Posted December 13, 2009 (edited) not that photoshopped image necessarly means cheating, but this image was 100% certain under the works of photoshop at one point of the creation process  Edited December 13, 2009 by ocisfun Quote
anvil Posted December 13, 2009 Posted December 13, 2009 Congratz to everyone ! Â Just one question, some of HwNOT scores have been deleted. This means that Topalof is the first one ? Quote
Massman Posted December 13, 2009 Author Posted December 13, 2009 The official ranking will be made public in the beginning of next week. Quote
|ron Posted December 14, 2009 Posted December 14, 2009 'grats Topalof, you kept the lead almost from the beginning, you deserved to win! Quote
Topalof Posted December 14, 2009 Posted December 14, 2009 (edited) thanks all,and congratz all other teams and participants i'm very happy  thanks Edited December 14, 2009 by Topalof Quote
Topalof Posted December 14, 2009 Posted December 14, 2009 Yes, I am aware, and I thank everybody,the organization,msi,staff hwbot for all the work done to moderate the contest,ect ... thanks all Quote
VickaOC Posted December 14, 2009 Posted December 14, 2009 Frenchies for the win  Heyhey  Great work french guys. Big thanks to Topalof to represent our country . Quote
jmax_oc Posted December 14, 2009 Posted December 14, 2009 Congratz Topalof ! And congratz for many reasons : 1/ You never gave up and you always pushed your hardware to its limit, you win every MHz with hours and hours. Congratz for it. 2/ You didn't make the unfair and 'unfun' method of backups. You continously announced your position (first since the early beginning). What a pity that you were 'forced' to keep some backups to counter last minutes submitters. RB, for the future, I suggest a bonus / malus. An early score had to get bonus and a lastminute score had to get malus. It could be a good idea. 3/ I thought that your submission made things better in french overclocking community. It's the first time different communities was 'together' behind you and your score (the french score) Â For all these reasons, I would like to say you one thing : BRAVO ! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.