Posted March 28, 201213 yr Setup: Core i7-3930K @4.7 GH, Asus Rampage IV Extreme, 8 GB DDR3-2400 MHz Kingston, Antec HP-1200W. Drivers Catalyst 12.3 + GeForce 300.10. 3D Mark Vantage + 3D Mark 11 - Extreme Preset, 1920x1200 (1080) Heaven 3.0 - 2560x1600 Tesselation Disabled, 4xAF + 4xAA, 1920x1200 Tesselation Extreme 16xAF + 8xAA Crysis Warhead - 2560x1600 Enthusiast, DX10, 4xAA More games/test later ... Edited March 29, 201213 yr by OBR
March 29, 201213 yr Author clock to clock- 7970 is on the top. yes, in 3D mark Vantage about 2 percents ... same in Heaven with Tesselation, same in game ... in 3D mark 11 GeForce wins ...
March 29, 201213 yr sadly we cant use this to so much(: Is the same as GTX 580 vs 7970 clock for clock. "was before GTX 680 came out" GTX 580 at 772 and 7970 at 950. Would Like to see 7970 at 772 too(:
March 29, 201213 yr Author ive tested it bacause Ocing WR, we already know max clocks of GTX 680 + 7970 are +/- the same 1,8-1,9 GHz ... for 3d vantage is better 7970, for 3d11 is better 680, for Heaven again 7970 ...
March 29, 201213 yr thanks for the detailed test! that confirms me I bought the wrong card for benching ^^
March 30, 201213 yr Author maybe not! If GTX 680 wil reach 2 GHz with better VRM cards, you will be winner everywhere ... i am sure
March 30, 201213 yr somebody change the name of the thread !!! "GK104 (GTX 608) vs Tahiti XT (HD 7970) clock to clock comparision ..." to "GK104 (GTX 680) vs Tahiti XT (HD 7970) clock to clock comparision ..."
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.