hipro5 Posted January 27, 2010 Share Posted January 27, 2010 Take a look at the below links... How is it possible the score of 40k be No1 in the ranking? http://hwbot.org/rankings/benchmark/3dmark_2005/rankings?cores=3 AND how is it possible the No1 score THOUGH it doesn't have points, to BE there?: http://hwbot.org/rankings/benchmark/superpi_32m/rankings Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 27, 2010 Share Posted January 27, 2010 Both excellent questions. Let me have a look at it ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hipro5 Posted January 28, 2010 Author Share Posted January 28, 2010 Have you found it out?.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 28, 2010 Share Posted January 28, 2010 The first result is a complete mystery for me ... there's no reason why the score should turn up there ... I'll keep looking :-/ The second is an issue we've noticed recently. The change in code had an effect on the way score are ranked, in particular how nda-hardware scores affect the boints. The issue is not that easy to solve, so we're looking for work-around alternatives at the moment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hipro5 Posted January 30, 2010 Author Share Posted January 30, 2010 As for the 32M rankings, I'm loosing ~30 points for me (and my team) and Stummie looses another ~50 points or so.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 Yeah. There's a fix coming in REV3.5, together with the WR points, but it's maybe too long. I'll see if we can get a temporary fix. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westsider Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 and one more problem if some result gives me 0.1 point i could just disable participation in ranking and top places are loosing points i mean its not fair play but it would be legal as far as i know 0.1 point rule ist useless sombody who thinks a little bit would just disable ranking a dumb one thinks 0.1 points are still something but some other concurent is getting for this 0.1 maybe even 2-3 points extra i think this system is wrong my opinion just Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 I bench for my team. Every point, even 0.1, is worth to bench for. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 and one more problem if some result gives me 0.1 point i could just disable participation in ranking and top places are loosing points i mean its not fair play but it would be legal as far as i know 0.1 point rule ist useless sombody who thinks a little bit would just disable ranking a dumb one thinks 0.1 points are still something but some other concurent is getting for this 0.1 maybe even 2-3 points extra i think this system is wrong my opinion just A dumb one refuses to accept boints for a result. EOD. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hipro5 Posted January 30, 2010 Author Share Posted January 30, 2010 Another bug...... i5 750 between the 4 core cpus... http://www.hwbot.org/rankings/benchmark/wprime_32m/rankings?cores=4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 The i5 750 is in fact a 4xCPU ... but the ranking isn't really right. I think I have fixed it, so should be correct in the next ranking update. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westsider Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 I bench for my team. Every point, even 0.1, is worth to bench for. yes but if your 0.1 point gives the concurent side 2 points ?even then? you dont win 0.1 in this case you lose 1.9points Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 If you remove points, you lose all points. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hipro5 Posted February 1, 2010 Author Share Posted February 1, 2010 Not to start a new thread.... http://hwbot.org/rankings/benchmark/wprime_32m/rankings?cores=4 Where's Vince's No1 score as for the wPrime32M?.... You have remove it?.... What happent to it?... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 Hm. The score wasn't detected as "best submission". I forced the engine to rescan and now it's receiving points again. Ranking will update in a few minutes, I think. Score is insane LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richba5tard Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 link to submission in question? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hipro5 Posted February 1, 2010 Author Share Posted February 1, 2010 HEY!.....I "lost" my Super-Pi 1M score with the 8600!..... What happent to it?..... http://hwbot.org/community/submission/923068_hipro5_superpi_core_2_e8600_3.33ghz_6sec_734ms http://hwbot.org/rankings/benchmark/superpi/rankings . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 link to submission in question? http://hwbot.org/community/submission/935049_kingpin HEY!.....I "lost" my Super-Pi 1M score with the 8600!..... What happent to it?..... http://hwbot.org/community/submission/923068_hipro5_superpi_core_2_e8600_3.33ghz_6sec_734ms http://hwbot.org/rankings/benchmark/superpi/rankings . Same issue again :-/ Fixed it for you, points should be back in no time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hipro5 Posted February 1, 2010 Author Share Posted February 1, 2010 (edited) Can't these issues be fixed automaticaly?..... Each one HAS to check his submissions once a time every day or so?..... EDIT: when the Super-Pi 32M list will be fixed?.....C'mon - c'mon, we are paying you a lot of money to be ALWAYS here...... Edited February 1, 2010 by hipro5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 Well, normally this happens automatically. There's an issue that prevents the 'automatic' to go correctly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hipro5 Posted February 1, 2010 Author Share Posted February 1, 2010 Question: IF there are TWO IDENTICAL scores, HOW does the engine put them into rankings? By the "submission date" FIRST (the OLDER FIRST - the NEWER FIRST)? OR by the CPU FREQUENCY (the LOWER FIRST)? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 I don't know how it was before, but we hardcoded in rev3 that submissions are ranking by: score,date. So, first the score counts, then whoever submits first. We were thinking about ranking on frequency instead of date ... but it's way to easy to cheat with that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hipro5 Posted February 1, 2010 Author Share Posted February 1, 2010 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 That's right! If you have a backup of a similar score, you better not wait for posting :p Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hipro5 Posted February 1, 2010 Author Share Posted February 1, 2010 No, it's too late now.... HE has submited it on DECEMBER.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.