Wow, same as Splave's submission o_O really impressed by efficiency! Did you used a special tweak or just random run?

ancient Japanese secret I see that you have found it as well. Great run!

Edited May 14, 201213 yr by Splave

Thanks guys:)

Splave-san, what have you found??

I was just kidding nice run man

Found low voltage then better score

ding ding ding

Found! low voltage = better score

 

bingo

Edited May 14, 201213 yr by Hondacity

Found low voltage then better score

 

Thermal throttling?

why would it be thermal throttling...its full pot.

Found low voltage then better score

 

I get credit for this right? lmao

 

Honda I think the chips are more efficient with a smaller delta between core and pot. Less voltage less heat..

Whoah. Nice find!

Its not called thermal throttling though. Thermal throttling is a safety mechanism. At this temperatures and high voltage its another thing. I don't remember the term lol.

Its not called thermal throttling though. Thermal throttling is a safety mechanism. At this temperatures and high voltage its another thing. I don't remember the term lol.

 

Thermal throttling does not have to be at what you consider high temperature.... And honestly, has Intel only made one fluck up with Ivy???

 

I can think of 2 already...

1) TIM has 1/8th conductivity

2) Some Intel staff, wanted to sue half of the review sites globally, and especially overclockers 'leaking' - but as usual, hollow preaching, balls to follow up on the big words wasnt present.

 

BUT; I agree with the evil minded Dutchman, nice find.

Its called saturation point. All switching transistor exhibit this when they are pushed at their limit.

Its called saturation point. All switching transistor exhibit this when they are pushed at their limit.

 

Oh man, damn you, now I wont just have to study for exams, saturation point I'm going to follow up on ;-)

Cheers though.

while you're at it read intel's white paper on thermal throttling

I thought I would have posted the comment below just after my previous comment(#3), but did not;

 

" I think this could be a bug-run, cos I can't reproduce the same level of score afterwards. I will delete this submission in some hours"

 

So I think low voltage doesn't matter at all for this result at least.

I am sorry for confusing...

I don't think its a bugged run. Splave's efficiency is close. It could be transistor q changes with temp and degrading thermal paste between ihs and die.

I thought I would have posted the comment below just after my previous comment(#3), but did not;

 

" I think this could be a bug-run, cos I can't reproduce the same level of score afterwards. I will delete this submission in some hours"

 

So I think low voltage doesn't matter at all for this result at least.

 

hey mate

I have scores leading up to this and it was reproducible for me

I don't think its a bugged run either. Lots of ways to screw up wprime runs, and a few ways to make a good score slightly better than another at the same frequency.

Hi splave-san! So you found something, congrats:)

And I haven't yet... Anyway I'll do what I said:D

 

hey mate

I have scores leading up to this and it was reproducible for me